Clinical Validation of the PCR-reverse Dot Blot Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Test in Cervical Lesions from Chinese Women in the Fujian Province: a Hospital-based Population Study
Overview
Oncology
Affiliations
Objective: To determine the clinical significance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot blot (RDB) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay in cervical cancer screening.
Methods: A total of 10,442 women attending the Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Health Hospital were evaluated using the liquid-based cytology (thinprep cytologic test [TCT]) and the PCR-RDB HPV test. Women with HPV infection and/or abnormal cytology were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. For HPV DNA sequencing, 120 specimens were randomly selected. Pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard.
Results: Using the PCR-RDB HPV test, overall HPV prevalence was 20.57% (2,148/10,442) and that of high-risk (HR)-HPV infection was 18.68% (1,951/10,442). There was 99.2% concordance between HPV PCR-RDB testing and sequencing. In this studied population, the most common HR-HPV types were HPV-16, -52, -58, -18, -53, -33, and -51, rank from high to low. HPV-16, -18, -58, -59, and -33 were the top 5 prevalent genotypes in cervical cancer but HPV-16, -18, -59, -45, and -33 were the top 5 highest risk factors for cancer (odds ratio [OR]=34.964, 7.278, 6.728, 6.101, and 3.658; all p<0.05, respectively). Among 10,442 cases, 1,278 had abnormal cytology results, of which, the HR-HPV positivity rate was 83.02% (1,061/1,278). To screen for cervical cancer by PCR-RDB HPV testing, when using CIN2+, CIN3+, and cancer as observed endpoints, the sensitivity was 90.43%, 92.61%, and 94.78% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.06%, 99.42%, and 99.78%, respectively. PCR-RDB HPV and TCT co-testing achieved the highest sensitivity and NPV.
Conclusion: For cervical cancer screening, the PCR-RDB HPV test can provide a reliable and sensitive clinical reference.
Yin J, Cheng S, Liu D, Tian Y, Hu F, Zhang Z J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 2(3):148-154.
PMID: 39036447 PMC: 11256530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.06.003.
Marembo T, Fitzpatrick M, Mandishora R Intervirology. 2024; .
PMID: 38574482 PMC: 11057445. DOI: 10.1159/000531347.
Ao M, Yao X, Zheng D, Gu X, Xi M Infect Agent Cancer. 2023; 18(1):57.
PMID: 37807070 PMC: 10561498. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00540-9.
Huang G, Gao H, Chen Y, Lin W, Shen J, Xu S J Inflamm Res. 2023; 16:1923-1936.
PMID: 37152868 PMC: 10162391. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S406082.
Lan Z, Zhang J, Li H, He R, Zhao Q, Yang F Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1094560.
PMID: 36687652 PMC: 9845708. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1094560.