» Articles » PMID: 28657218

Clinical Validation of the PCR-reverse Dot Blot Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Test in Cervical Lesions from Chinese Women in the Fujian Province: a Hospital-based Population Study

Overview
Journal J Gynecol Oncol
Date 2017 Jun 29
PMID 28657218
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical significance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-reverse dot blot (RDB) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assay in cervical cancer screening.

Methods: A total of 10,442 women attending the Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Health Hospital were evaluated using the liquid-based cytology (thinprep cytologic test [TCT]) and the PCR-RDB HPV test. Women with HPV infection and/or abnormal cytology were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. For HPV DNA sequencing, 120 specimens were randomly selected. Pathological diagnosis was used as the gold standard.

Results: Using the PCR-RDB HPV test, overall HPV prevalence was 20.57% (2,148/10,442) and that of high-risk (HR)-HPV infection was 18.68% (1,951/10,442). There was 99.2% concordance between HPV PCR-RDB testing and sequencing. In this studied population, the most common HR-HPV types were HPV-16, -52, -58, -18, -53, -33, and -51, rank from high to low. HPV-16, -18, -58, -59, and -33 were the top 5 prevalent genotypes in cervical cancer but HPV-16, -18, -59, -45, and -33 were the top 5 highest risk factors for cancer (odds ratio [OR]=34.964, 7.278, 6.728, 6.101, and 3.658; all p<0.05, respectively). Among 10,442 cases, 1,278 had abnormal cytology results, of which, the HR-HPV positivity rate was 83.02% (1,061/1,278). To screen for cervical cancer by PCR-RDB HPV testing, when using CIN2+, CIN3+, and cancer as observed endpoints, the sensitivity was 90.43%, 92.61%, and 94.78% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.06%, 99.42%, and 99.78%, respectively. PCR-RDB HPV and TCT co-testing achieved the highest sensitivity and NPV.

Conclusion: For cervical cancer screening, the PCR-RDB HPV test can provide a reliable and sensitive clinical reference.

Citing Articles

Head-to-head comparison of 7 high-sensitive human papillomavirus nucleic acid detection technologies with the SPF10 LiPA-25 system.

Yin J, Cheng S, Liu D, Tian Y, Hu F, Zhang Z J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024; 2(3):148-154.

PMID: 39036447 PMC: 11256530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.06.003.


Human papillomavirus genotype distribution patterns in Zimbabwe; is the bivalent vaccine sufficient?.

Marembo T, Fitzpatrick M, Mandishora R Intervirology. 2024; .

PMID: 38574482 PMC: 11057445. DOI: 10.1159/000531347.


Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more diagnoses for human papillomavirus16/18-positive women by cytology and co-infection status.

Ao M, Yao X, Zheng D, Gu X, Xi M Infect Agent Cancer. 2023; 18(1):57.

PMID: 37807070 PMC: 10561498. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-023-00540-9.


Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as the Prognostic Factor for Recurrence/Residual Disease in HSIL Patients After LEEP.

Huang G, Gao H, Chen Y, Lin W, Shen J, Xu S J Inflamm Res. 2023; 16:1923-1936.

PMID: 37152868 PMC: 10162391. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S406082.


Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes and related cervical morphological results in southern Hunan Province of China, 2018-2020: Baseline measures at a tertiary institution prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination.

Lan Z, Zhang J, Li H, He R, Zhao Q, Yang F Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1094560.

PMID: 36687652 PMC: 9845708. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1094560.


References
1.
Moosa K, Alsayyad A, Quint W, Gopala K, DeAntonio R . An epidemiological study assessing the prevalence of human papillomavirus types in women in the Kingdom of Bahrain. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14:905. PMC: 4265506. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-905. View

2.
Einstein M, Martens M, Garcia F, Ferris D, Mitchell A, Day S . Clinical validation of the Cervista HPV HR and 16/18 genotyping tests for use in women with ASC-US cytology. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 118(2):116-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.013. View

3.
Stoler M, Austin R, Zhao C . Point-Counterpoint: Cervical Cancer Screening Should Be Done by Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing with Genotyping and Reflex Cytology for Women over the Age of 25 Years. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53(9):2798-804. PMC: 4540928. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01087-15. View

4.
Meijer C, Snijders P, Castle P . Clinical utility of HPV genotyping. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103(1):12-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.07.031. View

5.
Ishida K, Araki A, Kobayashi M, Taniyama K, Nabika T, Nagasaki M . An evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic significance of p16(INK4a) /p21(WAF1/Cip1) immunostaining in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix using liquid-based cytology specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013; 42(2):125-33. DOI: 10.1002/dc.23008. View