» Articles » PMID: 33061708

The Triage Effectiveness of an Extended High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Assay for Women with Cytology Showing Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance in China

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Oct 16
PMID 33061708
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the performance of extended high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotyping triage of cytology showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of triage with different HR-HPV genotype models among women with ASC-US.

Materials And Methods: In this study, all women who underwent cervical cytology and HR-HPV genotyping were enrolled from 2014 to 2017 in China, and those with cytology showing ASC-US were referred for colposcopy and/or biopsy. The endpoint was histological detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). The outcome indicators were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs) and colposcopy referral rates.

Results: In all, 56,788 women were enrolled in this study, and 2658 (4.97%) women were reported to have ASC-US; 10.1% (242/2393) of women with ASC-US were identified as having CIN2+. The HR-HPV infection rate was 95.0% among all women with ASC-US who were identified as CIN2+, and the top five genotypes with prevalence and risk of CIN2+ were HPV16 (OR=26.38), HPV58 (OR=7.04), HPV18 (OR=4.44), HPV33 (OR=3.38), HPV31 (OR=2.97) and HPV52 (OR=2.96). The HPV16/18/31/33/52/58 model achieved higher sensitivity [91.3 (87.8-94.9)], specificity [70.0 (68.1-72.0)], PPV [25.5 (22.4-28.2)] and NPV [98.6 (97.3-98.7)] for the triage of ASC-US patients than the other HR-HPV-type combination models, but the colposcopy referral rate (36.2%) was significantly lower than that of the recommended HR-HPV nongenotyping model (47.6%).

Conclusion: This study confirms that the specific HR-HPV genotype HPV16/18/31/33/52/58 is an alternative strategy for ASC-US triage and can effectively reduce the high burden of colposcopy referrals in China.

Citing Articles

Risk-based triage strategy by extended HPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology.

Rao X, Wang Y, Chen R, Wu Q, Zhang X, Fu Y Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2451183.

PMID: 39823191 PMC: 11749152. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2451183.


Cervical cancer screening: efficacy of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation assay in the triage of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US).

Chen X, Jiang H, Xu H, Wang L, Liu P, Ma D BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1385.

PMID: 39528979 PMC: 11556146. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13082-z.


Review of triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance among young women.

Cubaka Ntamushigo J, Motshedisi Sebitloane H Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 168(2):428-435.

PMID: 39268663 PMC: 11726148. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15915.


Comprehensive overview of genotype distribution and prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical lesions.

Ye Y, Jones T, Wang T, Zeng X, Liu Y, Zhao C Gynecol Obstet Clin Med. 2024; 4(1).

PMID: 38650896 PMC: 11034807. DOI: 10.1136/gocm-2024-000005.


Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of HPV Extended versus Partial Genotyping for Cervical Cancer Screening in Singapore.

Chua B, Lim L, Soon Yau Ng J, Ma Y, Wee H, Caro J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 36980698 PMC: 10046888. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061812.


References
1.
Kjaer S, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T . Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(19):1478-88. PMC: 2950170. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq356. View

2.
Kyrgiou M, Kalliala I, Mitra A, Fotopoulou C, Ghaem-Maghami S, Martin-Hirsch P . Immediate referral to colposcopy versus cytological surveillance for minor cervical cytological abnormalities in the absence of HPV test. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 1:CD009836. PMC: 6464319. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009836.pub2. View

3.
Kang W, Ju U, Kim S . Is human papillomavirus genotype important in predicting disease progression in women with biopsy-proven negative or CIN1 of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology?. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 148(2):305-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.025. View

4.
Nobbenhuis M, Walboomers J, Helmerhorst T, Rozendaal L, Remmink A, Risse E . Relation of human papillomavirus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study. Lancet. 1999; 354(9172):20-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12490-X. View

5.
Silver M, Andrews J, Cooper C, Gage J, Gold M, Khan M . Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 or Worse by Cytology, Human Papillomavirus 16/18, and Colposcopy Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132(3):725-735. PMC: 6105396. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002812. View