» Articles » PMID: 28653865

Sagittal-Plane Knee Moment During Gait and Knee Cartilage Thickness

Overview
Journal J Athl Train
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Jun 28
PMID 28653865
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context:   Understanding the factors associated with thicker cartilage in a healthy population is important when developing strategies aimed at minimizing the cartilage thinning associated with knee osteoarthritis progression. Thicker articular cartilage is commonly thought to be healthier cartilage, but whether the sagittal-plane biomechanics important to gait are related to cartilage thickness is unknown.

Objective:   To determine the relationship of a weight-bearing region of the medial femoral condyle's cartilage thickness to sagittal gait biomechanics in healthy individuals.

Design:   Descriptive laboratory study.

Setting:   Laboratory.

Patients Or Other Participants:   Twenty-eight healthy participants (15 women: age = 21.1 ± 2.1 years, height = 1.63 ± 0.07 m, weight = 64.6 ± 9.9 kg; 13 men: age = 22.1 ± 2.9 years, height = 1.79 ± 0.05 m, weight = 75.2 ± 9.6 kg).

Main Outcome Measure(s):   Tibiofemoral angle (°) was obtained via goniometric assessment, thickness of the medial femoral condyle cartilage (mm) was obtained via ultrasound imaging, and peak internal knee-extensor moment (% body weight · height) was measured during 10 trials of over-ground walking at a self-selected pace. We used linear regression to examine the extent to which peak internal knee-extensor moment predicted cartilage thickness after accounting for tibiofemoral angle and sex.

Results:   Sex and tibiofemoral angle (12.3° ± 3.2°) were entered in the initial step as control factors (R = 0.01, P = .872). In the final step, internal knee-extensor moment (1.5% ± 1.3% body weight · height) was entered, which resulted in greater knee-extensor moment being related to greater cartilage thickness (2.0 ± 0.3 mm; RΔ = 0.31, PΔ = .003).

Conclusion:   Individuals who walked with a greater peak internal knee-extensor moment during gait had a cartilage structure that is generally considered beneficial in a healthy population. Our study offers promising findings that a potentially modifiable biomechanical factor is associated with cartilage status in a healthy population. Establishing these baseline relationships in uninjured populations may help us to better understand potential factors related to maladaptive gait patterns that predispose a person to adverse changes in the cartilage environment.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Knee Position on Ultrasound Imaging of Femoral Cartilage in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Battersby H, Holmes S, Shumski E, Heredia C, Garcia S, Pamukoff D Cartilage. 2023; 15(2):84-93.

PMID: 37846037 PMC: 11368891. DOI: 10.1177/19476035231205682.


Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction.

Singleton S, Scofield H, Davis B, Waller A, Garrison C, Goto S Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023; V18(3):596-605.

PMID: 37415672 PMC: 10321778. DOI: 10.26603/001c.77362.


Intraoperative Acoustic Evaluation of Living Human Knee Cartilage-Comparison with Respect to Cartilage Degeneration and Aging.

Nakagawa Y, Mori K, Mukai S, Shinya Y, Nakamura R, Takahashi M Cartilage. 2023; 14(3):261-268.

PMID: 36788438 PMC: 10601570. DOI: 10.1177/19476035231154509.


Effects of Limb Dominance on Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Gait at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Goto S, Garrison J, Singleton S, Dietrich L, Hannon J Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 10(7):23259671221088316.

PMID: 35928177 PMC: 9344123. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221088316.


Knee joint biomechanics during gait improve from 3 to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Neal K, Williams J, Alfayyadh A, Capin J, Khandha A, Manal K J Orthop Res. 2022; 40(9):2025-2038.

PMID: 34989019 PMC: 9256843. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25250.


References
1.
Lelas J, Merriman G, Riley P, Kerrigan D . Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed. Gait Posture. 2003; 17(2):106-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00060-7. View

2.
Pradsgaard D, Fiirgaard B, Spannow A, Heuck C, Herlin T . Cartilage thickness of the knee joint in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: comparative assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 2014; 42(3):534-40. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140162. View

3.
Arnold A, Anderson F, Pandy M, Delp S . Muscular contributions to hip and knee extension during the single limb stance phase of normal gait: a framework for investigating the causes of crouch gait. J Biomech. 2005; 38(11):2181-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.036. View

4.
Cicuttini F, Teichtahl A, Wluka A, Davis S, Strauss B, Ebeling P . The relationship between body composition and knee cartilage volume in healthy, middle-aged subjects. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52(2):461-7. DOI: 10.1002/art.20791. View

5.
Ostergaard M, Gideon P, Wieslander S, Cortsen M, Lorenzen I, Henriksen O . Ultrasonography in arthritis of the knee. A comparison with MR imaging. Acta Radiol. 1995; 36(1):19-26. View