» Articles » PMID: 28650896

Development and Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Adaptive Behaviors in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders

Abstract

Purpose: To establish validity for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) self-administered Adaptive Behavior Index (ABI) and to assess whether ABI assesses known discordance between severity of pelvic floor symptoms and self-reported bother.

Methods: In addition to the ABI questionnaire, participants in 1 of 6 Pelvic Floor Disorders Network trials completed condition-specific measures of pretreatment symptom severity (including Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; PFDI) and health-related quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire; PFIQ). The final survey was developed from an iterative process using subject and expert endorsement, factor analyses, and response distributions. Domains were created using a development cohort (n = 304 women), reliability and validity were established using a validation cohort (n = 596 women), and test-retest reliability was assessed (n = 111 women).

Results: Factor analyses supported an 11-item avoidance domain and a 6-item hygiene domain. Cronbach' alphas were 0.88 and 0.68, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.84 for both domains. Construct validity was demonstrated in correlations between the ABI domains and baseline PFDI and PFIQ (r values, 0.43-0.79 with all P values <0.0001). Moreover, the ABI accounted for 8% to 26% of unexplained variance between the symptoms severity measure and the impact on health related quality of life. After treatment, avoidance domain scores improved for urinary and fecal incontinence groups and hygiene scores improved for the fecal incontinence group.

Conclusions: The ABI is a reliable and valid measure in women with pelvic floor disorders. Adaptive behaviors account in part for discordance between pelvic floor symptom severity and bother.

Citing Articles

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network: Evolution Over Two Decades of Female Pelvic Floor Research.

Richter H, Visco A, Brubaker L, Sung V, Nygaard I, Arya L Urogynecology (Phila). 2025; 30(10):854-869.

PMID: 39752613 PMC: 11706353. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001571.


Optimizing remote access to urinary incontinence treatments for women veterans (PRACTICAL): Study protocol for a pragmatic clinical trial comparing two virtual care options.

Markland A, Vaughan C, Goldstein K, Hastings S, Kelly U, Beasley T Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 133:107328.

PMID: 37659594 PMC: 10591807. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107328.


Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review.

Dieter A, Halder G, Pennycuff J, Singh R, El-Nashar S, Lipetskaia L Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 141(6):1098-1114.

PMID: 37073897 PMC: 10524573. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005212.


Validation of bladder health scales and function indices for women's research.

Constantine M, Rockwood T, Rickey L, Bavendam T, Low L, Lowder J Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 228(5):566.e1-566.e14.

PMID: 36596439 PMC: 10425263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.319.


Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Fecal Incontinence in Women: The NeurOmodulaTion for Accidental Bowel Leakage Study.

Zyczynski H, Arya L, Lukacz E, Richter H, Rahn D, Sung V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 27(12):726-734.

PMID: 33950027 PMC: 8567096. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001050.


References
1.
Jelovsek J, Barber M . Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(5):1455-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.060. View

2.
Handa V, Harvey L, Cundiff G, Siddique S, Kjerulff K . Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(3):751-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.017. View

3.
Wei J, Nygaard I, Richter H, Nager C, Barber M, Kenton K . A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(25):2358-67. PMC: 3433843. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111967. View

4.
Rockwood T, Church J, Fleshman J, Kane R, Mavrantonis C, Thorson A . Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02237236. View

5.
Fitzgerald M, Janz N, Wren P, Wei J, Weber A, Ghetti C . Prolapse severity, symptoms and impact on quality of life among women planning sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 98(1):24-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.03.018. View