» Articles » PMID: 28620708

Validation of Fourier Analysis of Videokeratographic Data

Overview
Journal Int Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 Jun 17
PMID 28620708
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to assess the repeatability of Fourier transfom analysis of videokeratographic data using Pentacam in normal (CG), keratoconic (KC) and post-CXL (CXL) corneas.

Methods: This was a prospective, clinic-based, observational study. One randomly selected eye from all study participants was included in the analysis: 62 normal eyes (CG group), 33 keratoconus eyes (KC group), while 34 eyes, which had already received CXL treatment, formed the CXL group. Fourier analysis of keratometric data were obtained using Pentacam, by two different operators within each of two sessions. Precision, repeatability and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), were calculated for evaluating intrassesion and intersession repeatability for the following parameters: Spherical Component (SphRmin, SphEcc), Maximum Decentration (Max Dec), Regular Astigmatism, and Irregularitiy (Irr). Bland-Altman analysis was used for assessing interobserver repeatability.

Results: All parameters were presented to be repeatable, reliable and reproductible in all groups. Best intrasession and intersession repeatability and reliability were detected for parameters SphRmin, SphEcc and Max Dec parameters for both operators using ICC (intrasession: ICC > 98%, intersession: ICC > 94.7%) and within subject standard deviation. Best precision and lowest range of agreement was found for the SphRmin parameter (CG: 0.05, KC: 0.16, and CXL: 0.2) in all groups, while the lowest repeatability, reliability and reproducibility was detected for the Irr parameter.

Conclusions: The Pentacam system provides accurate measurements of Fourier tranform keratometric data. A single Pentacam scan will be sufficient for most clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Fourier analysis of corneal irregular astigmatism after small-incision lenticule extraction and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: A comparative study.

Ning J, Zhang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(9):e37340.

PMID: 38428861 PMC: 10906594. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037340.


Fourier analysis of corneal Scheimpflug imaging: clinical use in keratoconus.

Akincioglu D, Ozge G, Ayyildiz O, Gokce G, Karaca U, Mutlu F Int J Ophthalmol. 2021; 14(12):1963-1969.

PMID: 34926215 PMC: 8640755. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.23.


Fourier Analysis of Keratometric Data in Epithelium Removal versus Epithelial Disruption Corneal Cross-linking.

Bamdad S, Zaheryani S, Mohaghegh S, Shirvani M J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020; 15(1):16-23.

PMID: 32095204 PMC: 7001009. DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v15i1.5934.

References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ. 1996; 313(7048):41-2. PMC: 2351452. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.41. View

2.
Sideroudi H, Labiris G, Giarmoulakis A, Bougatsou N, Mikropoulos D, Kozobolis V . Repeatability, reliability and reproducibility of posterior curvature and wavefront aberrations in keratoconic and cross-linked corneas. Clin Exp Optom. 2013; 96(6):547-56. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12044. View

3.
Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan C, Pesudovs K . Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34(1):103-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

5.
Nesburn A, Bahri S, Salz J, Rabinowitz Y, Maguen E, Hofbauer J . Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg. 1995; 11(3):194-201. View