» Articles » PMID: 28620694

Results of Day-case Ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for Stone Disease: Prospective Outcomes over 4.5 years

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Jun 17
PMID 28620694
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the prospective outcomes of day-case ureterorenoscopy (DC-URS) for stone disease. With the rising prevalence of stone disease in the face of finite resources, there is increasing pressure to undertake procedures as a day case avoiding in-patient stay. There are a limited number of studies reporting on the feasibility of ureteroscopy as a day-case procedure. This study aimed to investigate the prospective outcomes and predictors precluding to DC-URS for stone disease in patients treated in our university teaching hospital.

Materials And Methods: Between March 2012 and July 2016, consecutive cases of adult stone ureteroscopy performed or supervised by a single surgeon were recorded in a prospective database. Patients underwent pre-operative counselling in a specialist stone clinic and were admitted to a dedicated 'Surgical day unit' on the day of surgery. A standardised anaesthetic protocol was adhered to in all cases. Data on patient demographics, stone parameters, pre-operative assessment, operative details, length of stay, stone-free rate and complication rates were collected and analysed.

Results: A total of 544 consecutive adult ureteroscopy for stone disease were conducted over the study period with a day-case rate of 77.7%. Thirty-nine percent of failed day-case ureteroscopy were due to late completion of ureteroscopy and due to associated social circumstances of patients. The mean stone size, operating time duration and post-operative stent insertion rates for DC-URS patients were 14 mm, 46 min and 96.5%, respectively. Post-operatively, the mean stone-free rate (SFR), unplanned re-admissions and complications for DC-URS patients were 95, 4 and 4%, respectively. A higher failure of DC-URS was related to patient's age (p = 0.003), positive pre-operative urine culture (p < 0.001), elevated pre-operative serum creatinine (p < 0.001) and higher mean operating time (p < 0.02).

Conclusion: Based on our results, a day-case ureteroscopy rate of nearly 78% can be achieved. With its acceptable complication rate, and low re-admission rates, DC-URS is a safe and feasible option in a majority of patients with stone disease.

Citing Articles

Stent Omission after Ureteroscopy and Lithotripsy (SOUL) in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC): study protocol for a pragmatic prospective combined randomized and observational clinical trial.

Becker R, Daignault-Newton S, Shoemaker E, Sitek D, Thelus J, Clark S Trials. 2024; 25(1):811.

PMID: 39633425 PMC: 11616357. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08587-8.


UROPOT: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind phase I/II trial for metabolism-based potentiation of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the urological tract.

Stritt K, Roth B, Masnada A, Hammann F, Jacot D, Domingos-Pereira S Trials. 2024; 25(1):682.

PMID: 39407325 PMC: 11476011. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08526-7.


Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Mitroi G, Dragoescu P, Mitroi M, Mitroi G, Dudan I, Popescu T Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337914 PMC: 11433351. DOI: 10.3390/life14091131.


Retrograde intrarenal surgery with central neuraxial blockade versus general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patil A, Patel A, Pande B Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18(2):231-239.

PMID: 38654871 PMC: 11033904. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_16_24.


Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.

Tang X, Wu S, Li Z, Wang D, Lei C, Liu T BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):44.

PMID: 38374098 PMC: 10875760. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01419-6.


References
1.
El-Nahas A, Ibrahim H, Youssef R, Sheir K . Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. BJU Int. 2012; 110(6):898-902. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. View

2.
Rukin N, Siddiqui Z, Chedgy E, Somani B . Trends in Upper Tract Stone Disease in England: Evidence from the Hospital Episodes Statistics Database. Urol Int. 2016; 98(4):391-396. DOI: 10.1159/000449510. View

3.
Aboumarzouk O, Monga M, Kata S, Traxer O, Somani B . Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012; 26(10):1257-63. DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0217. View

4.
Gunlusoy B, Degirmenci T, Kozacioglu Z, Arslan M, Ceylan Y, Nergiz N . Factors affecting the complications of pneumatic lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral stones with different localizations: a multivariate analysis of complications. Urol Int. 2013; 91(3):357-62. DOI: 10.1159/000350243. View

5.
Cheung M, Lee F, Leung Y, Wong B, Chu S, Tam P . Outpatient ureteroscopy: predictive factors for postoperative events. Urology. 2001; 58(6):914-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01445-5. View