» Articles » PMID: 24642147

The S.T.O.N.E. Score: a New Assessment Tool to Predict Stone Free Rates in Ureteroscopy from Pre-operative Radiological Features

Overview
Journal Int Braz J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2014 Mar 20
PMID 24642147
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a user friendly system (S.T.O.N.E. Score) to quantify and describe stone characteristics provided by computed axial tomography scan to predict ureteroscopy outcomes and to evaluate the characteristics that are thought to affect stone free rates.

Materials And Methods: The S.T.O.N.E. score consists of 5 stone characteristics: (S) ize, (T)opography (location of stone), (O)bstruction, (N)umber of stones present, and (E)valuation of Hounsfield Units. Each component is scored on a 1-3 point scale. The S.T.O.N.E. Score was applied to 200 rigid and flexible ureteroscopies performed at our institution. A logistic model was applied to evaluate our data for stone free rates (SFR).

Results: SFR were found to be correlated to S.T.O.N.E. Score. As S.T.O.N.E. Score increased, the SFR decreased with a logical regression trend (p < 0.001). The logistic model found was SFR=1/(1+e^(-z)), where z=7.02-0.57•Score with an area under the curve of 0.764. A S.T.O.N.E. Score ≤ 9 points obtains stone free rates > 90% and typically falls off by 10% per point thereafter.

Conclusions: The S.T.O.N.E. Score is a novel assessment tool to predict SFR in patients who require URS for the surgical therapy of ureteral and renal stone disease. The features of S.T.O.N.E. are relevant in predicting SFR with URS. Size, location, and degree of hydronephrosis were statistically significant factors in multivariate analysis. The S.T.O.N.E. Score establishes the framework for future analysis of the treatment of urolithiasis.

Citing Articles

External validation of Ito's nomogram and T.O.HO. scoring system in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Bulut S, Yahsi S, Ceviz K, Esengen S, Gultekin H BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):203.

PMID: 39285395 PMC: 11403866. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01550-4.


Comparative analysis of scoring systems for patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery with isolated lower calyx stones.

Haberal H, Ibis M, Akpinar S, Uyanikoglu B, Ekmen H, Sadioglu F World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):447.

PMID: 39066919 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05165-0.


A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score.

Perri D, Mazzoleni F, Besana U, Pacchetti A, Morini E, Calandriello M Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):58.

PMID: 38565776 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.


Residual fragment size following retrograde intrarenal surgery: a critical evaluation of related variables.

Uslu M, Yildirim U, Ezer M, Erihan I, Sarica K Urolithiasis. 2023; 51(1):100.

PMID: 37556003 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01478-8.


Surgical outcomes of patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery using a ureteral access sheath to manage kidney stones sized 1-2 cm compared between patients who did and did not undergo preoperative ureteral stenting.

Assantachai K, Srinualnad S, Leewansangtong S, Taweemonkongsap T, Liangkobkit K, Chotikawanich E Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e15801.

PMID: 37305517 PMC: 10256857. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15801.