» Articles » PMID: 28595577

Complementary and Conventional Providers in Cancer Care: Experience of Communication with Patients and Steps to Improve Communication with Other Providers

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Jun 10
PMID 28595577
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Effective interdisciplinary communication is important to achieve better quality in health care. The aims of this study were to compare conventional and complementary providers' experience of communication about complementary therapies and conventional medicine with their cancer patients, and to investigate how they experience interdisciplinary communication and cooperation.

Method: This study analyzed data from a self-administrated questionnaire. A total of 606 different health care providers, from four counties in Norway, completed the questionnaire. The survey was developed to describe aspects of the communication pattern among oncology doctors, nurses, family physicians and complementary therapists (acupuncturists, massage therapists and reflexologists/zone-therapists). Between-group differences were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and Fisher's exact tests. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05 without adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Result: Conventional providers and complementary therapists had different patterns of communication with their cancer patients regarding complementary therapies. While complementary therapists advised their patients to apply both complementary and conventional modalities, medical doctors were less supportive of their patients' use of complementary therapies. Of conventional providers, nurses expressed more positive attitudes toward complementary therapies. Opportunities to improve communication between conventional and complementary providers were most strongly supported by complementary providers and nurses; medical doctors were less supportive of such attempts. A number of doctors showed lack of respect for complementary therapists, but asked for more research, guidelines for complementary modalities and training in conventional medicine for complementary therapists.

Conclusion: For better quality of care, greater communication about complementary therapy use is needed between cancer patients and their conventional and complementary providers. In addition, more communication between conventional and complementary providers is needed. Nurses may have a crucial role in facilitating communication, as they are positive toward complementary therapies and they have more direct communication with patients about their treatment preferences.

Citing Articles

Enhancing patient activation: a controlled implementation study of an interprofessional evidence-based counseling program for complementary and integrative healthcare in cancer patients ('CCC-Integrativ').

Valentini J, Froehlich D, Roesel I, Stolz R, Mahler C, Martus P Front Med. 2024; 18(6):1013-1025.

PMID: 39542987 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-024-1097-z.


Varieties of silence - a mixed-methods study exploring reasons and justifications for nondisclosure of the use of complementary therapies to physicians in Finland.

Aarva P, Vaananen T, Pyykkonen M, Kankkunen T BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024; 24(1):336.

PMID: 39300393 PMC: 11414170. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04640-w.


Interprofessional contact with conventional healthcare providers in oncology: a survey among complementary medicine practitioners.

Mentink M, Jansen J, Noordman J, van Vliet L, Busch M, van Dulmen S BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024; 24(1):285.

PMID: 39061012 PMC: 11282773. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04563-6.


Allopathic Medicine Practitioners' perspectives on facilitating disclosure of traditional medicine use in Gauteng, South Africa: a qualitative study.

Gumede L, Nkosi P, Sibiya M BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023; 23(1):451.

PMID: 38087333 PMC: 10717688. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04270-8.


Perception of integrating complementary and alternative medicine practice in patient's treatment among the healthcare practitioners: a systematic review.

Aizuddin A, Zamzuri M, Mansor J, Nurumal S, Yunus S, Abd Razak M Pan Afr Med J. 2022; 43:19.

PMID: 36451723 PMC: 9674529. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.19.31133.


References
1.
Salamonsen A . Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients' choice of alternative therapies as supplement or alternative to conventional care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012; 27(1):70-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01002.x. View

2.
Klimenko E, Julliard K . Communication between CAM and mainstream medicine: Delphi panel perspectives. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007; 13(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.07.004. View

3.
Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J . Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001; 357(9258):757-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04169-6. View

4.
The A, Hak T, Koeter G, van der Wal G . Collusion in doctor-patient communication about imminent death: an ethnographic study. BMJ. 2000; 321(7273):1376-81. PMC: 27539. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1376. View

5.
Barrett B, Marchand L, Scheder J, Appelbaum D, Chapman M, Jacobs C . Bridging the gap between conventional and alternative medicine. J Fam Pract. 2000; 49(3):234-9. View