Acceptance and Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Medical Specialists: a 15-year Systematic Review and Data Synthesis

Overview

Journal Syst Rev

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2022 Jan 14

PMID 35027078

Authors

Phanupong Phutrakool

Krit Pongpirul

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has gained popularity among the general population, but its acceptance and use among medical specialists have been inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to identify relevant studies and synthesize survey data on the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus databases for the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists. Each article was assessed by two screeners. Only survey studies relevant to the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists were reviewed. The pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses. This review followed both PRISMA and SWiM guidelines.

Results: Of 5628 articles published between 2002 and 2017, 25 fulfilled the selection criteria. Ten medical specialties were included: Internal Medicine (11 studies), Pediatrics (6 studies), Obstetrics and Gynecology (6 studies), Anesthesiology (4 studies), Surgery (3 studies), Family Medicine (3 studies), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (3 studies), Psychiatry and Neurology (2 studies), Otolaryngology (1 study), and Neurological Surgery (1 study). The overall acceptance of CAM was 52% (95%CI, 42-62%). Family Medicine reported the highest acceptance, followed by Psychiatry and Neurology, Neurological Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Internal Medicine, and Surgery. The overall use of CAM was 45% (95% CI, 37-54%). The highest use of CAM was by the Obstetrics and Gynecology, followed by Family Medicine, Psychiatry and Neurology, Pediatrics, Otolaryngology, Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Surgery. Based on the studies, meta-regression showed no statistically significant difference across geographic regions, economic levels of the country, or sampling methods.

Conclusion: Acceptance and use of CAM varied across medical specialists. CAM was accepted and used the most by Family Medicine but the least by Surgery. Findings from this systematic review could be useful for strategic harmonization of CAM and conventional medicine practice.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019125628.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap: attitudes and practices toward complementary and alternative medicine among oncology patients and healthcare professionals in Croatia.

Armano L, Vasiljev V, Rukavina T, Juraga D, Racz A, Tesic V Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1531111.

PMID: 39981396 PMC: 11841391. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531111.

Language models for data extraction and risk of bias assessment in complementary medicine.

Lai H, Liu J, Bai C, Liu H, Pan B, Luo X NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):74.

PMID: 39890970 PMC: 11785717. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01457-w.

Prevalence of and factors associated with trauma surgeons' referral and patients' willingness to acupuncture treatment after traumatic rib fractures: A single-center cross-sectional study.

Kim M, Cho H, Kim S, Kim Y, Shin Y, Kim K Integr Med Res. 2024; 13(4):101096.

PMID: 39635075 PMC: 11616596. DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101096.

How can meta-research be used to evaluate and improve the quality of research in the field of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine?.

Ng J, Lee M, Liu J, Steel A, Wieland L, Witt C Integr Med Res. 2024; 13(3):101068.

PMID: 39253695 PMC: 11381986. DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101068.

Evaluation of clinical characters and use of alternative medicines in the management of headache and predictors of treatment satisfaction among Saudi adults - A community-based study in Saudi Arabia.

Alghamdi A, Eidhah Alsufyani M, Ali Alwadei F, Abdullah Alshehri H, Samarkandi O, Syed W Prev Med Rep. 2024; 43:102787.

PMID: 38975282 PMC: 11225024. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102787.

References

Mak J, Mak L, Shen Q, Faux S . Perceptions and attitudes of rehabilitation medicine physicians on complementary and alternative medicine in Australia. Intern Med J. 2009; 39(3):164-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01734.x. View

Chang K, Brodie R, Choong M, Sweeney K, Kerin M . Complementary and alternative medicine use in oncology: a questionnaire survey of patients and health care professionals. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11:196. PMC: 3123324. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-196. View

Brambila-Tapia A, Rios-Gonzalez B, Lopez-Barragan L, Saldana-Cruz A, Rodriguez-Vazquez K . Attitudes, Knowledge, Use, and Recommendation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine by Health Professionals in Western Mexico. Explore (NY). 2016; 12(3):180-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2016.02.002. View

Rosenbaum M, Nisly N, Ferguson K, Kligman E . Academic physicians and complementary and alternative medicine: an institutional survey. Am J Med Qual. 2002; 17(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1177/106286060201700102. View

Babbar S, Williams K, Maulik D . Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Modern Obstetrics: A Survey of the Central Association of Obstetricians & Gynecologists Members. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2016; 22(3):429-435. PMC: 5871154. DOI: 10.1177/2156587216671215. View

Gaboury I, Johnson N, Robin C, Luc M, OConnor D, Patenaude J . Complementary and alternative medicine: Do physicians believe they can meet the requirements of the Collège des médecins du Québec?. Can Fam Physician. 2016; 62(12):e772-e775. PMC: 5154669. View

Johnson S, Park H, Gross C, Yu J . Use of Alternative Medicine for Cancer and Its Impact on Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017; 110(1). DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx145. View

Peltzer K, Pengpid S . Prevalence and Determinants of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine Provider Use among Adults from 32 Countries. Chin J Integr Med. 2016; 24(8):584-590. DOI: 10.1007/s11655-016-2748-y. View

Jakovljevic M, Djordjevic V, Markovic V, Milovanovic O, Rancic N, Cupara S . Cross-sectional survey on complementary and alternative medicine awareness among health care professionals and students using CHBQ questionnaire in a Balkan country. Chin J Integr Med. 2013; 19(9):650-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11655-013-1434-6. View

10.

Risberg T, Kolstad A, Bremnes Y, Holte H, Wist E, Mella O . Knowledge of and attitudes toward complementary and alternative therapies; a national multicentre study of oncology professionals in Norway. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40(4):529-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.011. View

11.

Samuels N, Zisk-Rony R, Many A, Ben-Shitrit G, Erez O, Mankuta D . Use of and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine among obstetricians in Israel. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 121(2):132-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.008. View

12.

Kolstad A, Risberg T, Bremnes Y, Wilsgaard T, Holte H, Klepp O . Use of complementary and alternative therapies: a national multicentre study of oncology health professionals in Norway. Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(5):312-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0590-9. View

13.

Bauml J, Chokshi S, Schapira M, Im E, Li S, Langer C . Do attitudes and beliefs regarding complementary and alternative medicine impact its use among patients with cancer? A cross-sectional survey. Cancer. 2015; 121(14):2431-8. PMC: 5589132. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29173. View

14.

Kemper K, OConnor K . Pediatricians' recommendations for complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies. Ambul Pediatr. 2004; 4(6):482-7. DOI: 10.1367/A04-050R.1. View

15.

Munstedt K, Maisch M, Tinneberg H, Hubner J . Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in obstetrics and gynaecology: a survey of office-based obstetricians and gynaecologists regarding attitudes towards CAM, its provision and cooperation with other CAM providers in the state of Hesse,.... Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 290(6):1133-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3315-4. View

16.

Joseph K, Vrouwe S, Kamruzzaman A, Balbaid A, Fenton D, Berendt R . Outcome analysis of breast cancer patients who declined evidence-based treatment. World J Surg Oncol. 2012; 10:118. PMC: 3438047. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-118. View

17.

Wu C, Weber W, Kozak L, Standish L, Ojemann J, Ellenbogen R . A survey of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) awareness among neurosurgeons in Washington State. J Altern Complement Med. 2009; 15(5):551-5. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2008.0427. View

18.

Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C . Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 65(9):934-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014. View

19.

Kim S, Capo-Lugo C, Reed W, Vora A, Ehsanian R, Krishnan S . Using a Survey to Characterize Rehabilitation Professionals' Perceptions and Use of Complementary, Integrative, and Alternative Medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2020; 26(8):663-665. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0383. View

20.

Soos S, Jeszenoi N, Darvas K, Harsanyi L . Complementary and alternative medicine: attitudes, knowledge and use among surgeons and anaesthesiologists in Hungary. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016; 16(1):443. PMC: 5100213. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1426-0. View