» Articles » PMID: 28593461

Self-prioritization and Perceptual Matching: The Effects of Temporal Construal

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 Jun 9
PMID 28593461
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent research has revealed that self-referential processing enhances perceptual judgments - the so-called self-prioritization effect. The extent and origin of this effect remains unknown, however. Noting the multifaceted nature of the self, here we hypothesized that temporal influences on self-construal (i.e., past/future-self continuity) may serve as an important determinant of stimulus prioritization. Specifically, as representations of the self increase in abstraction as a function of temporal distance (i.e., distance from now), self-prioritization may only emerge when stimuli are associated with the current self. The results of three experiments supported this prediction. Self-relevance only enhanced performance in a standard perceptual-matching task when stimuli (i.e., geometric shapes) were connected with the current self; representations of the self in the future (Expts. 1 & 2) and past (Expt. 3) failed to facilitate decision making. To identify the processes underlying task performance, data were interrogated using a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) approach. Results of these analyses revealed that self-prioritization was underpinned by a stimulus bias (i.e., rate of information uptake). Collectively, these findings elucidate when and how self-relevance influences decisional processing.

Citing Articles

Cognitive and neural underpinnings of friend-prioritization in a perceptual matching task.

Gao T, Zhou Y, Pan X, Li W, Han S Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025; 20(1).

PMID: 39831532 PMC: 11792655. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaf009.


You do you: susceptibility of temporal binding to self-relevance.

Muth F, Ebert S, Kunde W Psychol Res. 2024; 88(3):1007-1022.

PMID: 38170225 PMC: 10965574. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-023-01906-9.


Social affiliation is sufficient to provoke the partner-advantage.

Tseng C, Jingling L, Cheng M Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21293.

PMID: 36494379 PMC: 9734190. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25052-1.


Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims.

Golubickis M, Neil Macrae C Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 18(4):876-886.

PMID: 36356105 PMC: 10336703. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221131273.


Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?.

Orellana-Corrales G, Matschke C, Schafer S, Wesslein A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022; 76(6):1379-1390.

PMID: 36052697 PMC: 10196926. DOI: 10.1177/17470218221124928.


References
1.
Sui J, He X, Humphreys G . Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(5):1105-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0029792. View

2.
Neil Macrae C, Moran J, Heatherton T, Banfield J, Kelley W . Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(6):647-54. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh025. View

3.
Knoblich G, Flach R . Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychol Sci. 2002; 12(6):467-72. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00387. View

4.
Pronin E, Ross L . Temporal differences in trait self-ascription: when the self is seen as an other. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 90(2):197-209. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.197. View

5.
van Ravenzwaaij D, Mulder M, Tuerlinckx F, Wagenmakers E . Do the dynamics of prior information depend on task context? An analysis of optimal performance and an empirical test. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:132. PMC: 3351677. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00132. View