Neural Predictors of Within-subject Fluctuations in Attentional Control

Overview

Journal J Neurosci

Specialty Neurology

Date 2010 Aug 27

PMID 20739567

Citations 49

Authors

Andrew B Leber

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Whether salient objects automatically capture attention has long been the subject of considerable controversy. A possible resolution, investigated in this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, is that observers vacillate between periods when attention capture is robust and when it is minimal. Human observers searched static displays for a target circle among nontarget squares; an irrelevant color singleton distractor appeared on 50% of trials. Behavioral results showed a distraction effect in which response times to distractor-present trials were slower than for distractor-absent trials. fMRI results confirmed that this distraction effect not only fluctuated within experimental sessions, but the momentary degree of distraction could be predicted in advance by pretrial activity in middle frontal gyrus. A second experiment ruled out an alternative account by which participants achieved resistance to capture by trading off search efficiency. Together, these data reveal that observers frequently exert the capacity to resist attentional distraction, although they do not to sustain this capacity for long periods of time.

Citing Articles

Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.

Anderson B Vision Res. 2024; 217:108366.

PMID: 38387262 PMC: 11523554. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108366.

Different neural mechanisms for nonsalient trained stimuli and physically salient stimuli in visual processing.

Wang Z, Zhang Q, Hao Y, Xu S Psych J. 2023; 13(2):227-241.

PMID: 38151802 PMC: 10990809. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.718.

The location independence of learned attentional flexibility.

Sali A, Ma R, Albal M, Key J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022; 84(3):682-699.

PMID: 35352297 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02469-4.

Prefrontal Control of Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms of Visual Suppression.

Di Bello F, Ben Hadj Hassen S, Astrand E, Hamed S Cereb Cortex. 2021; 32(13):2745-2761.

PMID: 34734977 PMC: 9247412. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab378.

The past, present, and future of selection history.

Anderson B, Kim H, Kim A, Liao M, Mrkonja L, Clement A Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 130:326-350.

PMID: 34499927 PMC: 8511179. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004.

References

Kumada T . Feature-based control of attention: evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Percept Psychophys. 2001; 63(4):698-708. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194430. View

Folk C, Remington R, Johnston J . Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992; 18(4):1030-44. View

Gusnard D, Raichle M . Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(10):685-94. DOI: 10.1038/35094500. View

Lien M, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, Remington R . Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008; 34(3):509-30. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.509. View

Eichele T, Debener S, Calhoun V, Specht K, Engel A, Hugdahl K . Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(16):6173-8. PMC: 2329680. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708965105. View

Treue S, Maunsell J . Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature. 1996; 382(6591):539-41. DOI: 10.1038/382539a0. View

Fox M, Snyder A, Vincent J, Corbetta M, Van Essen D, Raichle M . The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(27):9673-8. PMC: 1157105. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102. View

Yantis S, Egeth H . On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999; 25(3):661-76. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.3.661. View

Lamy D, Carmel T, Egeth H, Leber A . Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search. Percept Psychophys. 2006; 68(6):919-32. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193355. View

10.

Liu T, Slotnick S, Serences J, Yantis S . Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 13(12):1334-43. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg080. View

11.

Egner T, Monti J, Trittschuh E, Wieneke C, Hirsch J, Mesulam M . Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(24):6141-51. PMC: 6670545. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1262-08.2008. View

12.

Saenz M, Buracas G, Boynton G . Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(7):631-2. DOI: 10.1038/nn876. View

13.

Todd S, Kramer A . Attentional misguidance in visual search. Percept Psychophys. 1994; 56(2):198-210. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213898. View

14.

Hickey C, van Zoest W, Theeuwes J . The time course of exogenous and endogenous control of covert attention. Exp Brain Res. 2009; 201(4):789-96. PMC: 2839488. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2094-9. View

15.

Theeuwes J . Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys. 1991; 50(2):184-93. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212219. View

16.

Giesbrecht B, Woldorff M, Song A, Mangun G . Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(3):496-512. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00162-9. View

17.

Serences J, Boynton G . Feature-based attentional modulations in the absence of direct visual stimulation. Neuron. 2007; 55(2):301-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.015. View

18.

Chawla D, Rees G, Friston K . The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat Neurosci. 1999; 2(7):671-6. DOI: 10.1038/10230. View

19.

Bacon W, Egeth H . Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept Psychophys. 1994; 55(5):485-96. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205306. View

20.

Dove A, Pollmann S, Schubert T, Wiggins C, von Cramon D . Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000; 9(1):103-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00029-4. View