» Articles » PMID: 28575485

Adult IDH Wild-type Lower-grade Gliomas Should Be Further Stratified

Overview
Journal Neuro Oncol
Specialties Neurology
Oncology
Date 2017 Jun 3
PMID 28575485
Citations 112
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Astrocytoma of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gene is described as a provisional entity within the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Some groups believe that IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas, when interrogated for other biomarkers, will mostly turn out to be glioblastoma. We hypothesize that not all IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas have very poor outcomes and the group could be substratified prognostically.

Methods: Seven hundred and eighteen adult WHO grades II and III patients with gliomas from our hospitals were re-reviewed and tested for IDH1/2 mutations. One hundred and sixty-six patients with IDH wild-type cases were identified for further studies, and EGFR and MYB amplifications, mutations of histone H3F3A, TERT promoter (TERTp), and BRAF were examined.

Results: EGFR amplification, BRAF, and H3F3A mutations were observed in 13.8%, 6.9%, and 9.5% of patients, respectively, in a mutually exclusive pattern in IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas. TERTp mutations were detected in 26.8% of cases. Favorable outcome was observed in patients with young age, oligodendroglial phenotype, and grade II histology. Independent adverse prognostic values of older age, nontotal resection, grade III histology, EGFR amplification, and H3F3A mutation were confirmed by multivariable analysis. Tumors were further classified into "molecularly" high grade (harboring EGFR, H3F3A, or TERTp) (median overall survival = 1.23 y) and lower grade (lacking all of the 3) (median overall survival = 7.63 y) with independent prognostic relevance. The most favorable survival was noted in molecularly lower-grade gliomas with MYB amplification.

Conclusion: Adult IDH wild-type lower-grade gliomas are prognostically heterogeneous and do not have uniformly poor prognosis. Clinical information and additional markers, including MYB, EGFR, TERTp, and H3F3A, should be examined to delineate discrete favorable and unfavorable prognostic groups.

Citing Articles

A Radiologist's Guide to IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma for Efficient Communication With Clinicians: Part I-Essential Information on Preoperative and Immediate Postoperative Imaging.

Vollmuth P, Karschnia P, Sahm F, Park Y, Ahn S, Jain R Korean J Radiol. 2025; 26(3):246-268.

PMID: 39999966 PMC: 11865903. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0982.


Prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in WHO grade II glioma by diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Wu W, Zhang H Pol J Radiol. 2025; 89():e566-e572.

PMID: 39850400 PMC: 11756366. DOI: 10.5114/pjr/195521.


Multi-center real-world data-driven web calculator for predicting outcomes in IDH-mutant gliomas: Integrating molecular subtypes and treatment modalities.

Xu H, Liu B, Wang Y, Zhu R, Jiang S, Soliman L Neurooncol Adv. 2025; 7(1):vdae221.

PMID: 39844832 PMC: 11751580. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae221.


Cerebellopontine angle pilocytic astrocytoma in adults: A systematic review.

Bruzzaniti P, Pennisi G, Lapolla P, Familiari P, Maiola V, Quintiliani C Surg Neurol Int. 2024; 15:363.

PMID: 39524593 PMC: 11544465. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_539_2024.


Revisiting gliomatosis cerebri in adult-type diffuse gliomas: a comprehensive imaging, genomic and clinical analysis.

Shin I, Park Y, Sim Y, Choi S, Ahn S, Chang J Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2024; 12(1):128.

PMID: 39127694 PMC: 11316408. DOI: 10.1186/s40478-024-01832-w.


References
1.
Khan M, Sharma A, Pitz M, Loewen S, Quon H, Poulin A . High-grade glioma management and response assessment-recent advances and current challenges. Curr Oncol. 2016; 23(4):e383-91. PMC: 4974045. DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3082. View

2.
Chi A, Batchelor T, Yang D, Dias-Santagata D, Borger D, Ellisen L . BRAF V600E mutation identifies a subset of low-grade diffusely infiltrating gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(14):e233-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.0220. View

3.
Louis D, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee W . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131(6):803-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. View

4.
Zhang R, Shi Z, Chen H, Chung N, Yin Z, Li K . Biomarker-based prognostic stratification of young adult glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2015; 7(4):5030-41. PMC: 4826263. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5456. View

5.
Hurtt M, Moossy J, Locker J . Amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor gene in gliomas: histopathology and prognosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1992; 51(1):84-90. DOI: 10.1097/00005072-199201000-00010. View