» Articles » PMID: 25150284

Combined Analysis of TERT, EGFR, and IDH Status Defines Distinct Prognostic Glioblastoma Classes

Overview
Journal Neurology
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Aug 24
PMID 25150284
Citations 125
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify the prognostic significance of TERT promoter mutations (TERTp-mut) and their associations with common molecular alterations in glioblastomas (GBMs).

Methods: We sequenced the TERTp-mut in DNA from 395 GBMs and analyzed the results with their respective histology, genetic profile (IDH1 mutation, EGFR amplification, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, loss of chromosome 10, TP53 mutation), and overall survival (OS).

Results: TERTp-mut were found in 299 of 395 GBMs (75.7%) and were associated with an older age (median 59.6 years for TERTp-mut vs 53.6 years for TERT promoter wild type [TERTp-wt], p < 0.0001). TERTp-mut was an independent factor of poor prognosis (OS = 13.8 vs 18.4 months), in both IDH-mutated (OS = 13.8 vs 37.6 months, p = 0.022) and IDH-wt GBMs (OS = 13.7 vs 17.5 months, p = 0.006). TERTp-mut was associated with IDH-wt, EGFR amplification, CDKN2A deletion, and chromosome 10q loss, but not with MGMT promoter methylation. In the TERTp-wt group, OS was twice longer in EGFR-wt than in EGFR amplification GBMs (OS = 26.6 vs 13.3 months; p = 0.005). In the EGFR-wt group, patients with TERTp-wt had a significantly better outcome (OS = 26.3 vs 12.5 months, p < 0.0001), whereas in the EGFR amplification group, patients with TERTp-mut survived longer (OS = 15.8 vs 13.3 months, p = 0.05). Taken together, the absence of both EGFR amplification and TERTp-mut is associated with longer survival in patients with GBM (26.5 months for patients with IDH-wt, 36.7 months for patients with IDH mutation).

Conclusions: The analysis of TERTp-mut, in combination with EGFR amplification and IDH mutation status, refines the prognostic classification of GBMs.

Citing Articles

Molecular Characteristics of High-Grade Glioma in Relation to 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA) Fluorescence Intensity.

Garfias-Arjona Sr S, Lara-Almunia M, Anton-Valenti E, Pierola-Lopetegui J, Bestard-Escalas J, Maimo-Barcelo A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77774.

PMID: 39839210 PMC: 11749098. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77774.


Advances in Glioblastoma Diagnosis: Integrating Genetics, Noninvasive Sampling, and Advanced Imaging.

Gough R, Treffy R, Krucoff M, Desai R Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796751 PMC: 11720166. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010124.


Circulating biomarkers in high-grade gliomas: current insights and future perspectives.

Taori S, Habib A, Adida S, Gecici N, Sharma N, Calcaterra M J Neurooncol. 2024; 172(1):41-49.

PMID: 39671020 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04903-z.


The clinical impact of EGFR alterations in elderly glioblastoma patients: results from a real-life cohort.

Pulcini S, Beaussire-Trouvay L, Marguet F, Viailly P, Langlois O, Alexandru C J Neurooncol. 2024; 171(3):619-628.

PMID: 39549128 PMC: 11729081. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04879-w.


Integrative single-cell and bulk transcriptome analyses identify a distinct pro-tumor macrophage signature that has a major prognostic impact on glioblastomas.

Li P, Su G, Cui Y Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):187.

PMID: 39136841 PMC: 11322272. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01454-5.