Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component with Different Methods in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology

Date 2017 May 27

PMID 28545525

Citations 13

Authors

Joon Kyu Lee

Sahnghoon Lee

Sae Hyung Chun

Ki Tae Kim

Myung Chul Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Femoral component rotation (FCR) is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty. In this prospective study, we used three different techniques for FCR and analyzed their accuracy with postoperative axial computed tomography (CT) images. We also evaluated effect of FCR to clinical outcome.

Methods: One hundred sixty-five patients were randomly allocated into three groups. In the measured resection group, FCR was set by externally rotating the axis 3° off the posterior femoral condylar axis. In the tensor group, a gap-tensioning device set at 20 lbf was used. In the block group, spacer blocks of various thicknesses were used. The FCR angle (FCRa) was measured on postoperative axial CT as an angle between the clinical transepicondylar and posterior condylar axes of the femoral component. Outliers were defined as FCRas deviated more than 3° either internally or externally. Postoperative 2 year clinical scores and knee range of motion were checked.

Results: The tensor group had significantly better positioning of the femoral component to the neutral position compared with the measured resection group and the block group (mean FCRa: internal rotation 1.79, 0.43 and 2.63°, respectively, p < 0.001). The outliers were also least frequent in the tensor group (35, 16 and 40%, respectively, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in postoperative 2 year clinical results among groups.

Conclusions: Gap technique with a 20-lbf tensor device was the most accurate and precise method for obtaining adequate FCR. Measured resection with 3° external rotation and gap technique with blocks could lead to internal rotation of the femoral component. Postoperative 2 year clinical results were not significantly different among groups with different techniques for FCR.

Trial Registration: The study was registered in the Clinical Research information Service (trial number: KCT0000129 ) in Korea. Registration date is 23 of June, 2011.

Citing Articles

Comparison between ligament balancing and measured resection in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow up cohort study.

Yu M, Yang X, Xu Y, Zhu W, Peng H, Lin J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):152.

PMID: 39953453 PMC: 11827435. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08388-3.

Does mild flexion of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty result in better early postoperative outcomes?.

Zhou H, Wu Z, Chen X, Zhang L, Zhang J, Hidig S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):711.

PMID: 37674188 PMC: 10483864. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06840-w.

Virtual Joint Motion Simulator Accurately Predicts Effects of Femoral Component Malalignment during TKA.

Montgomery L, Willing R, Lanting B Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37237573 PMC: 10215153. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050503.

Could surgical transepicondylar axis be identified accurately in preoperative 3D planning for total knee arthroplasty? A reproducibility study based on 3D-CT.

Lei K, Liu L, Luo J, Ma C, Feng Q, Yang L Arthroplasty. 2022; 4(1):46.

PMID: 36244969 PMC: 9575283. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-022-00147-2.

Measurement for gap balancing technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a large retrospective observational study.

Xuequan Z, Bin Z, Shuzhang Y, Kanduo C, Chongxi R J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1):209.

PMID: 35392951 PMC: 8991780. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03104-6.

References

Jenny J, Boeri C . Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75(1):74-7. DOI: 10.1080/00016470410001708150. View

Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O . The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(2):235-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.024. View

Figgie 3rd H, Goldberg V, HEIPLE K, Moller 3rd H, Gordon N . The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68(7):1035-40. View

Lee D, Padhy D, Park J, Jeong W, Park J, Han S . The impact of a rectangular or trapezoidal flexion gap on the femoral component rotation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(7):1141-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1422-3. View

Olcott C, Scott R . The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (367):39-42. View

Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H . Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (366):155-63. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199909000-00019. View

Mantas J, Bloebaum R, Skedros J, Hofmann A . Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1992; 7(4):531-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(06)80075-6. View

Boldt J, Stiehl J, Munzinger U, Beverland D, Keblish P . Femoral component rotation in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2006; 13(4):284-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.01.007. View

Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, Hirasawa Y . Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(4):493-7. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23621. View

10.

Viera A, Garrett J . Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005; 37(5):360-3. View

11.

Berger R, Crossett L, Jacobs J, Rubash H . Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (356):144-53. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199811000-00021. View

12.

Fehring T . Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (380):72-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00010. View

13.

Barrack R, Schrader T, Bertot A, Wolfe M, Myers L . Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392):46-55. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00006. View

14.

Mochizuki R, Schurman D . Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(6A):879-83. View

15.

Dossett H, Estrada N, Swartz G, LeFevre G, Kwasman B . A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(7):907-13. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812. View

16.

Yoshino N, Watanabe N, Watanabe Y, Fukuda Y, Takai S . Measurement of joint gap load in patella everted and reset position during total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 17(5):484-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0656-1. View

17.

Laskin R . Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(5):657-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80211-6. View

18.

Griffin F, Insall J, Scuderi G . The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13(7):812-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90036-5. View

19.

Berger R, Rubash H, Seel M, Thompson W, Crossett L . Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; (286):40-7. View

20.

Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J . A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(5):683-90. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21827. View