» Articles » PMID: 28542831

Machine Learning Reveals a Non-canonical Mode of Peptide Binding to MHC Class II Molecules

Overview
Journal Immunology
Date 2017 May 26
PMID 28542831
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

MHC class II molecules play a fundamental role in the cellular immune system: they load short peptide fragments derived from extracellular proteins and present them on the cell surface. It is currently thought that the peptide binds lying more or less flat in the MHC groove, with a fixed distance of nine amino acids between the first and last residue in contact with the MHCII. While confirming that the great majority of peptides bind to the MHC using this canonical mode, we report evidence for an alternative, less common mode of interaction. A fraction of observed ligands were shown to have an unconventional spacing of the anchor residues that directly interact with the MHC, which could only be accommodated to the canonical MHC motif either by imposing a more stretched out peptide backbone (an 8mer core) or by the peptide bulging out of the MHC groove (a 10mer core). We estimated that on average 2% of peptides bind with a core deletion, and 0·45% with a core insertion, but the frequency of such non-canonical cores was as high as 10% for certain MHCII molecules. A mutational analysis and experimental validation of a number of these anomalous ligands demonstrated that they could only fit to their MHC binding motif with a non-canonical binding core of length different from nine. This previously undescribed mode of peptide binding to MHCII molecules gives a more complete picture of peptide presentation by MHCII and allows us to model more accurately this event.

Citing Articles

MHCII-peptide presentation: an assessment of the state-of-the-art prediction methods.

Yang Y, Wei Z, Cia G, Song X, Pucci F, Rooman M Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1293706.

PMID: 38646540 PMC: 11027168. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1293706.


Integrated image and location analysis for wound classification: a deep learning approach.

Patel Y, Shah T, Dhar M, Zhang T, Niezgoda J, Gopalakrishnan S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7043.

PMID: 38528003 PMC: 10963767. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56626-w.


Accurate modeling of peptide-MHC structures with AlphaFold.

Mikhaylov V, Brambley C, Keller G, Arbuiso A, Weiss L, Baker B Structure. 2023; 32(2):228-241.e4.

PMID: 38113889 PMC: 10872456. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011.


Immunoinformatics: Predicting Peptide-MHC Binding.

Nielsen M, Andreatta M, Peters B, Buus S Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2023; 3:191-215.

PMID: 37427310 PMC: 10328453. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-021920-100259.


Challenges targeting cancer neoantigens in 2021: a systematic literature review.

Chen I, Chen M, Goedegebuure S, Gillanders W Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021; 20(7):827-837.

PMID: 34047245 PMC: 8410655. DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1935248.


References
1.
Nielsen M, Lundegaard C, Lund O . Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8:238. PMC: 1939856. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-238. View

2.
Sidney J, Southwood S, Moore C, Oseroff C, Pinilla C, Grey H . Measurement of MHC/peptide interactions by gel filtration or monoclonal antibody capture. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2013; Chapter 18:Unit 18.3.. PMC: 3626435. DOI: 10.1002/0471142735.im1803s100. View

3.
Greenbaum J, Sidney J, Chung J, Brander C, Peters B, Sette A . Functional classification of class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules reveals seven different supertypes and a surprising degree of repertoire sharing across supertypes. Immunogenetics. 2011; 63(6):325-35. PMC: 3626422. DOI: 10.1007/s00251-011-0513-0. View

4.
Vita R, Overton J, Greenbaum J, Ponomarenko J, Clark J, Cantrell J . The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3.0. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 43(Database issue):D405-12. PMC: 4384014. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku938. View

5.
Shen W, Wei Y, Guo X, Smale S, Wong H, Cheng Li S . MHC binding prediction with KernelRLSpan and its variations. J Immunol Methods. 2014; 406:10-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.02.007. View