» Articles » PMID: 28538598

The Need for Multidimensional Stratification of Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP)

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 May 25
PMID 28538598
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: A cross-sectional study of Canadian patients suffering from low back pain (LBP) seeking primary care.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine which existing primary care LBP stratification schema is associated with distinct subpopulations as characterized by easily identifiable primary epidemiological factors.

Summary Of Background Data: LBP is among the most frequent reasons for visits to primary care physicians and a leading cause of years lived with disability. In an effort to improve treatment response/outcomes in LBP primary care, different classification systems have been proposed in an effort to provide more tailored treatment with the intent of improving outcomes. Group-specific risk factors and underlying etiology might suggest a need for, or inform, changes to treatment approaches to optimize LBP outcomes.

Methods: Stratification by dominant mechanical pain patterns; chronicity risk; disability severity. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify the system showing greatest variability in associations with age, sex, obesity, and comorbidity. Once identified, the remaining schemas were incorporated into the model.

Results: N = 970; mean age: 50 years (range: 18-93); 56% female. Stratification by pain pattern revealed greater variability. Adjusted analysis: Increasing age was associated with greater odds of intermittent, extension-based back- or leg-dominant pain [odds ratio (OR): 1.02 and 1.06; P < 0.01]; being male with leg-dominant pain (ORs > 2; P < 0.01). Overweight/obesity was associated with extension-based leg-dominant pain (OR = 2.6; P < 0.02) and increasing comorbidity with extension-based back-dominant pain (OR = 1.3; P < 0.01). Severe disability was associated only with constant leg pain (OR = 3.9; P < 0.01), and high chronicity risk with extension-based leg-dominant pain (OR = 0.4; P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Dominant mechanical symptom stratification resulted in further discrimination of an epidemiologically distinct and a large subgroup of LBP patients not identified by disability or chronicity risk stratification alone. Findings suggest a need for primary care initiated multidimensional stratification in chronic LBP.

Level Of Evidence: 3.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ling-Xin L, Ke-Yao H, Rui Z, Zuo-Yan L, Li-Hui P Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022; 68(3):439-446.

PMID: 36475107 PMC: 9706790. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.7797.


A Model to Implement Standardized Virtual Care for Low Back Pain Amongst a Large Network of Providers in Urban and Rural Settings.

Correale M, Soever L, Rampersaud Y J Prim Care Community Health. 2022; 13:21501319221130603.

PMID: 36300425 PMC: 9623358. DOI: 10.1177/21501319221130603.


Predictors of response following standardized education and self-management recommendations for low back pain stratified by dominant pain location.

Perruccio A, Wong J, Badley E, Power J, Yip C, Rampersaud Y N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 8:100092.

PMID: 35141656 PMC: 8820018. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100092.


Use of the PROMIS-10 global health in patients with chronic low back pain in outpatient physical therapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Pak S, Miller M, Cheuy V J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021; 5(1):81.

PMID: 34487270 PMC: 8421489. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00360-8.


Identification of subgroup effect with an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of three different types of therapist-delivered care in low back pain.

Hee S, Mistry D, Friede T, Lamb S, Stallard N, Underwood M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):191.

PMID: 33593341 PMC: 7885433. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04028-8.


References
1.
Hall H, McIntosh G, Boyle C . Effectiveness of a low back pain classification system. Spine J. 2009; 9(8):648-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.017. View

2.
Suri P, Rainville J, Kalichman L, Katz J . Does this older adult with lower extremity pain have the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis?. JAMA. 2010; 304(23):2628-36. PMC: 3260477. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1833. View

3.
Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F . A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64(6):2028-37. DOI: 10.1002/art.34347. View

4.
Donelson R, McIntosh G, Hall H . Is it time to rethink the typical course of low back pain?. PM R. 2012; 4(6):394-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.10.015. View

5.
Fairbank J, Gwilym S, France J, Daffner S, Dettori J, Hermsmeyer J . The role of classification of chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(21 Suppl):S19-42. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef72c. View