» Articles » PMID: 24308746

The Effectiveness of a Stratified Group Intervention Using the STarTBack Screening Tool in Patients with LBP--a Non Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2013 Dec 7
PMID 24308746
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is costly to society and improving patient outcomes is a priority. Stratifying LBP patients into more homogenous groups is advocated to improve patient outcome. The STarT Back tool, a prognostic screening tool has demonstrated efficacy and greater cost effectiveness in physiotherapy settings. The management of LBP patients in groups is common but to date the utility of the STarT Back tool in group settings has not been explored. The aim of this study is to determine if the implementation of 'stratified care' when delivered in a group setting will lead to significantly better physical and psychological outcomes and greater cost effectiveness in LBP patients compared to a bestcare historical control group.

Methods/design: This study is a non randomised controlled trial. Low back pain patients recruited from the Waterford Primary Care area (population = 47,000) will be stratified into low, medium or high risk of persisting symptoms using the STarT Back Tool. Low risk patients will be offered a single one off education/exercise class offering positive messages on LBP management in line with recommended guidelines. Medium risk patients will be offered a 12 week group exercise/education intervention addressing their dominant physical obstacles to recovery. A 12 week group cognitive behavioural approach will be delivered to the high risk patients, characterised by the presence of high levels of psychosocial prognostic factors. These patients will be compared with a historical control group where therapists were blinded as to the risk stratification of patients and a generic group intervention was delivered to all patients, irrespective of their initial risk stratification. The primary outcome measure will be disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes will include back pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), distress (Distress and Risk Assessment Method), back beliefs (Back Beliefs Questionnaire), health status (Euroqol), global benefit (7 point likert scale), satisfaction (7 point likert scale), cost effectiveness and functional status. Outcome will be measured at baseline, 12 weeks and 6 months.

Discussion: This paper details the rationale, design, methods, planned analysis and operational aspects of a study examining the utility of the STarT Back Tool as a 'stratification tool for targeted treatment' in a group intervention.

Trial Registration: Current controlled trials: ACTRN12613000431729.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Efficacy of Capacitive Resistive Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Managing Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Jurak I, Grabar S, Zura N, Jakus L Physiother Res Int. 2024; 30(1):e70009.

PMID: 39572389 PMC: 11582020. DOI: 10.1002/pri.70009.


A Stratified Approach for Managing Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care (SPLIT Program): A Before-and-After Study.

Gomes L, Fernandes R, Caeiro C, Henriques A, Dinis de Sousa R, Branco J Ann Fam Med. 2024; 22(3):195-202.

PMID: 38806277 PMC: 11237233. DOI: 10.1370/afm.3104.


Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study.

Whedon J, Bezdjian S, Dennis P, Fischer V, Russell R Chiropr Man Therap. 2020; 28(1):68.

PMID: 33308275 PMC: 7734754. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-020-00356-z.


Interdisciplinary stratified care for low back pain: A qualitative study on the acceptability, potential facilitators and barriers to implementation.

Caeiro C, Canhao H, Paiva S, Gomes L, Fernandes R, Rodrigues A PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225336.

PMID: 31730676 PMC: 6857944. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225336.


Advancing practice for back pain through stratified care (STarT Back).

Sowden G, Hill J, Morso L, Louw Q, Foster N Braz J Phys Ther. 2018; 22(4):255-264.

PMID: 29970301 PMC: 6095099. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.06.003.


References
1.
Fritz J, Beneciuk J, George S . Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Phys Ther. 2011; 91(5):722-32. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100109. View

2.
Borm G, Fransen J, Lemmens W . A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(12):1234-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006. View

3.
Main C, Wood P, Hollis S, Spanswick C, Waddell G . The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(1):42-52. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00007. View

4.
Robinson M, George S . Screening for problematic low back pain: STarT. Pain. 2012; 153(11):2159-2160. PMC: 3697922. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.018. View

5.
OSullivan P . It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 46(4):224-7. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. View