Investigating the Safety of Physical Rehabilitation with Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vasoactive Drugs: An Exploratory Observational Feasibility Study

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2025 Feb 13

PMID 39946416

Authors

Huw R Woodbridge

Caroline M Alexander

Stephen J Brett

David B Antcliffe

Ee Lyn Chan

Anthony C Gordon

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Physical rehabilitation of critically ill patients may improve physical outcomes; however, the relative benefits and risks with patients requiring vasoactive drugs is currently unknown. A feasibility study is needed to inform the design of a future trial required to address this issue.

Methods: A two-phase exploratory observational feasibility study was carried out: A retrospective study to clarify the current practice of rehabilitation with patients receiving vasoactive drugs to inform future trial interventions and design.A prospective study exploring recruitment and outcome measurement. Intensive care patients receiving vasoactive drugs were recruited and asked about the acceptability of a future trial. The feasibility of using an adverse event tool was measured during rehabilitation. Patients were followed up after 60 days to describe the feasibility of measuring outcomes for a future trial.

Results: Retrospective study (n = 78): Twenty-one percent of patients took part in physical rehabilitation whilst receiving vasoactive drugs. Of 321 days with vasoactive drugs administered, physical rehabilitation occurred on 27 days (8%). Prospective study (n = 40): Eighty-one percent of participants indicated acceptability of being recruited into a future trial (n = 37). Eighty-eight percent of clinicians found it acceptable to randomise patients into either early rehabilitation or standard care. The adverse event tool was implemented by researchers with 2% loss of information. Finally, a 100% follow-up rate at day 60 was achieved for mortality outcomes. Follow-up rates were 70% for the EQ-5D (5 level), 65% for the World Health Organisation's Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and RAND 36-item Health Survey 1.0 and 26% for the 6-minute walk test.

Conclusions: This study found a low frequency of physical rehabilitation occurring with intensive care patients receiving vasoactive drugs. A high proportion of clinicians and patients found a future RCT within this patient group acceptable. Mortality and patient-reported outcomes were the most feasible to measure.

References

Fan E, Dowdy D, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez P, Sevransky J, Shanholtz C . Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2013; 42(4):849-59. PMC: 3959239. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000040. View

Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan D, McDowell I . A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005; 173(5):489-95. PMC: 1188185. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050051. View

Berney S, Harrold M, Webb S, Seppelt I, Patman S, Thomas P . Intensive care unit mobility practices in Australia and New Zealand: a point prevalence study. Crit Care Resusc. 2013; 15(4):260-5. View

Sricharoenchai T, Parker A, Zanni J, Nelliot A, Dinglas V, Needham D . Safety of physical therapy interventions in critically ill patients: a single-center prospective evaluation of 1110 intensive care unit admissions. J Crit Care. 2014; 29(3):395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.12.012. View

Denehy L, Skinner E, Edbrooke L, Haines K, Warrillow S, Hawthorne G . Exercise rehabilitation for patients with critical illness: a randomized controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up. Crit Care. 2013; 17(4):R156. PMC: 4056792. DOI: 10.1186/cc12835. View

Connolly B, Mortimore J, Douiri A, Rose J, Hart N, Berney S . Low Levels of Physical Activity During Critical Illness and Weaning: The Evidence-Reality Gap. J Intensive Care Med. 2017; 34(10):818-827. PMC: 6716208. DOI: 10.1177/0885066617716377. View

Puthucheary Z, Denehy L . Exercise Interventions in Critical Illness Survivors: Understanding Inclusion and Stratification Criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 191(12):1464-7. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1907LE. View

McWilliams D, Jones C, Atkins G, Hodson J, Whitehouse T, Veenith T . Earlier and enhanced rehabilitation of mechanically ventilated patients in critical care: A feasibility randomised controlled trial. J Crit Care. 2018; 44:407-412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.001. View

Holland A, Spruit M, Troosters T, Puhan M, Pepin V, Saey D . An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014; 44(6):1428-46. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00150314. View

10.

Nydahl P, Ruhl A, Bartoszek G, Dubb R, Filipovic S, Flohr H . Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients: a 1-day point-prevalence study in Germany. Crit Care Med. 2013; 42(5):1178-86. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000149. View

11.

Li M, Harris I, Lu Z . Differences in proxy-reported and patient-reported outcomes: assessing health and functional status among medicare beneficiaries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:62. PMC: 4534114. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0053-7. View

12.

Iwashyna T, Wesley Ely E, Smith D, Langa K . Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA. 2010; 304(16):1787-94. PMC: 3345288. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1553. View

13.

Woodbridge H, Norton C, Jones M, Brett S, Alexander C, Gordon A . Clinician and patient perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to physical rehabilitation in intensive care: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e073061. PMC: 10632869. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073061. View

14.

Black C, Sanger H, Battle C, Eden A, Corner E . Feasibility of mobilisation in ICU: a multi-centre point prevalence study of mobility practices in the UK. Crit Care. 2023; 27(1):217. PMC: 10233540. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04508-4. View

15.

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S . The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2):142-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. View

16.

Lawton M, Brody E . Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3):179-86. View

17.

Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios L . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010; 10:1. PMC: 2824145. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. View

18.

Sosnowski K, Mitchell M, White H, Morrison L, Sutton J, Sharratt J . A feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial to examine the impact of the ABCDE bundle on quality of life in ICU survivors. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018; 4:32. PMC: 5765639. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0224-x. View

19.

Janssen M, Pickard A, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L . Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2012; 22(7):1717-27. PMC: 3764313. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4. View

20.

Rebel A, Marzano V, Green M, Johnston K, Wang J, Neeman T . Mobilisation is feasible in intensive care patients receiving vasoactive therapy: An observational study. Aust Crit Care. 2018; 32(2):139-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.004. View