Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Compared to Conventional, Centre-based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Results of the FIT@Home Study
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aim Although cardiac rehabilitation improves physical fitness after a cardiac event, many eligible patients do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation and the beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation are often not maintained over time. Home-based training with telemonitoring guidance could improve participation rates and enhance long-term effectiveness. Methods and results We randomised 90 low-to-moderate cardiac risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation to three months of either home-based training with telemonitoring guidance or centre-based training. Although training adherence was similar between groups, satisfaction was higher in the home-based group ( p = 0.02). Physical fitness improved at discharge ( p < 0.01) and at one-year follow-up ( p < 0.01) in both groups, without differences between groups (home-based p = 0.31 and centre-based p = 0.87). Physical activity levels did not change during the one-year study period (centre-based p = 0.38, home-based p = 0.80). Healthcare costs were statistically non-significantly lower in the home-based group (€437 per patient, 95% confidence interval -562 to 1436, p = 0.39). From a societal perspective, a statistically non-significant difference of €3160 per patient in favour of the home-based group was found (95% confidence interval -460 to 6780, p = 0.09) and the probability that it was more cost-effective varied between 97% and 75% (willingness-to-pay of €0 and €100,000 per quality-adjusted life-years, respectively). Conclusion We found no differences between home-based training with telemonitoring guidance and centre-based training on physical fitness, physical activity level or health-related quality of life. However, home-based training was associated with a higher patient satisfaction and appears to be more cost-effective than centre-based training. We conclude that home-based training with telemonitoring guidance can be used as an alternative to centre-based training for low-to-moderate cardiac risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation.
Wang S, Yu P, Zhou X, Yuan Y, Chen J, Chen D Front Med Technol. 2025; 6:1382316.
PMID: 39911292 PMC: 11794271. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1382316.
Faber J, Kraal J, Ter Hoeve N, Al-Dhahir I, Breeman L, Chavannes N Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025; 6(1):115-125.
PMID: 39846066 PMC: 11750199. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae084.
Almoghairi A, OBrien J, Duff J J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025; 36(4):371-380.
PMID: 39781229 PMC: 11708906. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1405.
Tian E, Martin P, Ingram L, Kumar S J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5521-5570.
PMID: 39605931 PMC: 11600924. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S489640.
Epelde F Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).
PMID: 39459370 PMC: 11509420. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101583.