» Articles » PMID: 28534417

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Compared to Conventional, Centre-based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Results of the FIT@Home Study

Overview
Date 2017 May 24
PMID 28534417
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim Although cardiac rehabilitation improves physical fitness after a cardiac event, many eligible patients do not participate in cardiac rehabilitation and the beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation are often not maintained over time. Home-based training with telemonitoring guidance could improve participation rates and enhance long-term effectiveness. Methods and results We randomised 90 low-to-moderate cardiac risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation to three months of either home-based training with telemonitoring guidance or centre-based training. Although training adherence was similar between groups, satisfaction was higher in the home-based group ( p = 0.02). Physical fitness improved at discharge ( p < 0.01) and at one-year follow-up ( p < 0.01) in both groups, without differences between groups (home-based p = 0.31 and centre-based p = 0.87). Physical activity levels did not change during the one-year study period (centre-based p = 0.38, home-based p = 0.80). Healthcare costs were statistically non-significantly lower in the home-based group (€437 per patient, 95% confidence interval -562 to 1436, p = 0.39). From a societal perspective, a statistically non-significant difference of €3160 per patient in favour of the home-based group was found (95% confidence interval -460 to 6780, p = 0.09) and the probability that it was more cost-effective varied between 97% and 75% (willingness-to-pay of €0 and €100,000 per quality-adjusted life-years, respectively). Conclusion We found no differences between home-based training with telemonitoring guidance and centre-based training on physical fitness, physical activity level or health-related quality of life. However, home-based training was associated with a higher patient satisfaction and appears to be more cost-effective than centre-based training. We conclude that home-based training with telemonitoring guidance can be used as an alternative to centre-based training for low-to-moderate cardiac risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation.

Citing Articles

Bibliometrics of the current state of application of teletechnology in the rehabilitation of patients with heart and large blood vessel disease.

Wang S, Yu P, Zhou X, Yuan Y, Chen J, Chen D Front Med Technol. 2025; 6:1382316.

PMID: 39911292 PMC: 11794271. DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1382316.


An eHealth intervention for patients with a low socioeconomic position during their waiting period preceding cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized feasibility study.

Faber J, Kraal J, Ter Hoeve N, Al-Dhahir I, Breeman L, Chavannes N Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025; 6(1):115-125.

PMID: 39846066 PMC: 11750199. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae084.


Perspectives of Policymakers on Barriers to and Enablers of the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.

Almoghairi A, OBrien J, Duff J J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2025; 36(4):371-380.

PMID: 39781229 PMC: 11708906. DOI: 10.37616/2212-5043.1405.


Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review.

Tian E, Martin P, Ingram L, Kumar S J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:5521-5570.

PMID: 39605931 PMC: 11600924. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S489640.


Optimizing Cardiac Rehabilitation in Heart Failure: Comprehensive Insights, Barriers, and Future Strategies.

Epelde F Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459370 PMC: 11509420. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101583.


References
1.
Koopmanschap M, Rutten F, van Ineveld B, van Roijen L . The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ. 1995; 14(2):171-89. DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00044-5. View

2.
Thompson S, Barber J . How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?. BMJ. 2000; 320(7243):1197-200. PMC: 1127588. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1197. View

3.
Yu C, Li L, Ho H, Lau C . Long-term changes in exercise capacity, quality of life, body anthropometry, and lipid profiles after a cardiac rehabilitation program in obese patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91(3):321-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03159-4. View

4.
Bock B, Carmona-Barros R, Esler J, Tilkemeier P . Program participation and physical activity maintenance after cardiac rehabilitation. Behav Modif. 2003; 27(1):37-53. DOI: 10.1177/0145445502238692. View

5.
Lorig K, Holman H . Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01. View