» Articles » PMID: 28526364

Surveillance of Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Wrist Accelerometry

Overview
Journal Am J Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 May 21
PMID 28526364
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Accurate tracking of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is important to advance public health, but little is known about how to interpret wrist-worn accelerometer data. This study compares youth estimates of SB and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) obtained using raw and count-based processing methods.

Methods: Data were collected between April and October 2014 for the National Cancer Institute's Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating Study: a cross-sectional Internet-based study of youth/family cancer prevention behaviors. A subsample of 628 adolescents (aged 12-17 years) wore the ActiGraph GT3X+ on the wrist for 7 days. In 2015-2016, SB and MVPA time were calculated from raw data using R-package GGIR and from activity counts data using published cutpoints (Crouter and Chandler). Estimates were compared across age, sex, and weight status to examine the impact of processing methods on behavioral outcomes.

Results: ActiGraph data were available for 408 participants. Large differences in SB and MVPA time were observed between processing methods, but age and gender patterns were similar. Younger children (aged 12-14 years) had lower sedentary time and greater MVPA time (p-values <0.05) than older children (aged 15-17 years), consistent across methods. The proportion of youth with ≥60 minutes of MVPA/day was highest with the Crouter methods (~50%) and lowest with GGIR (~0%).

Conclusions: Conclusions about youth PA and SB are influenced by the wrist-worn accelerometer data processing method. Efforts to harmonize processing methods are needed to promote standardization and facilitate reporting of monitor-based PA data.

Citing Articles

Accelerometry-assessed daily physical activity and compliance with recommendations in Spanish children: importance of physical education classes and vigorous intensity.

Benavente-Marin J, Baron-Lopez F, Gil Barcenilla B, Longo Abril G, Rumbao Aguirre J, Perez-Farinos N PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16990.

PMID: 38468640 PMC: 10926909. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16990.


A natural experiment to assess recess frequency on children's physical activity in Arizona (U.S.) elementary schools.

Poulos A, Wilson K, Schulke M, Nam K, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Bai Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):225.

PMID: 38238751 PMC: 10797942. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17605-4.


Calibration of the Online Youth Activity Profile Assessment for School-Based Applications.

Welk G, Saint-Maurice P, Dixon P, Hibbing P, Bai Y, McLoughlin G J Meas Phys Behav. 2024; 4(3):236-246.

PMID: 38223785 PMC: 10785831. DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2020-0048.


Physical Activity, Sleep, and Demographic Patterns in Alaska Native Children and Youth Living in Anaktuvuk Pass.

Grant V, Mekiana D, Philip J Youth (Basel). 2023; 3(1):321-334.

PMID: 38084312 PMC: 10712412. DOI: 10.3390/youth3010021.


Association of daily and time-segmented physical activity and sedentary behaviour with mental health of school children and adolescents from rural Northeastern Ontario, Canada.

da Costa B, Bruner B, Raymer G, Scharoun Benson S, Chaput J, McGoey T Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1025444.

PMID: 36389567 PMC: 9644206. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025444.


References
1.
Abbott R, Davies P . Habitual physical activity and physical activity intensity: their relation to body composition in 5.0-10.5-y-old children. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58(2):285-91. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601780. View

2.
Crouter S, Flynn J, Bassett Jr D . Estimating physical activity in youth using a wrist accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 47(5):944-51. PMC: 4362848. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000502. View

3.
Ekelund U, Sardinha L, Anderssen S, Harro M, Franks P, Brage S . Associations between objectively assessed physical activity and indicators of body fatness in 9- to 10-y-old European children: a population-based study from 4 distinct regions in Europe (the European Youth Heart Study). Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 80(3):584-90. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/80.3.584. View

4.
Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M . Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 40(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. View

5.
Trost S, Zheng Y, Wong W . Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data. Physiol Meas. 2014; 35(11):2183-9. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2183. View