» Articles » PMID: 28523479

Fatty Acids Have Different Adipogenic Differentiation Potentials in Stromal Vascular Cells Isolated from Abdominal Fat in Laying Hens

Overview
Journal Lipids
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2017 May 20
PMID 28523479
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the effects of fatty acids (FA) with/without chicken serum (CS) on the expression of adipogenic transcripts and adipogenesis in chicken stromal vascular cells (SVC). In experiment 1, SVC were grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS (Control) and treated with 300 µM oleic acid (OLA) + FBS, linoleic acid (LNA) + FBS, palmitic acid (PAM) + FBS, or stearic acid (STA) + FBS for 48 h. In experiment 2, cells were grown in DMEM containing 5% CS and treated with 300 µM OLA (CS + OLA), PAM (CS + PAM), STA (CS + STA) or 200 µM LNA (CS + LNA) for 48 h. Adipogenesis was determined using Oil Red O staining and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) activity. The proportion of OLA, PAM, or STA was increased (P < 0.05) in SVC grown in either FBS or CS with OLA, PAM or STA. Adipogenesis was induced in FBS + OLA, FBS + LNA, FBS + PAM, FBS + STA, CS + OLA, CS + LNA, CS + PAM, or CS + SAT compared to FBS. GPDH activity was significantly higher in FBS + OLA and FBS + LNA than one in FBS. Compared to FBS, the expression of FABP4 mRNA increased (P < 0.05) in FBS + OLA, FBS + LNA, or FBS + PAM, whereas that of C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and ATGL increased (P < 0.05) in FBS + OLA or FBS + LNA cells. Expression of FABP4 and C/EBPβ mRNA was higher in CS, CS + OLA, CS + LNA, CS + PAM, or CS + SAT compared with (FBS, whereas the expression of ATGL and C/EBPα was higher in CS, CS + OLA, or CS + LNA than FBS cells. In conclusion, these results showed that FA have different potentials to induce adipogenesis, LNA is the most potent among the tested FA, and these potentials can be improved in the presence of CS.

Citing Articles

Effects of storage culture media, temperature and duration on human adipose‑derived stem cell viability for clinical use.

Wu Y, Li M, Liao X, Li S, Yan J, Fan L Mol Med Rep. 2019; 19(3):2189-2201.

PMID: 30664198 PMC: 6390032. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.9842.

References
1.
Dilzer A, Park Y . Implication of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012; 52(6):488-513. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2010.501409. View

2.
Kershaw E, Hamm J, Verhagen L, Peroni O, Katic M, Flier J . Adipose triglyceride lipase: function, regulation by insulin, and comparison with adiponutrin. Diabetes. 2005; 55(1):148-57. PMC: 2819178. View

3.
Jenkins C, Mancuso D, Yan W, Sims H, Gibson B, Gross R . Identification, cloning, expression, and purification of three novel human calcium-independent phospholipase A2 family members possessing triacylglycerol lipase and acylglycerol transacylase activities. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(47):48968-75. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M407841200. View

4.
Lee K, Shin J, Latshaw J, Suh Y, Serr J . Cloning of adipose triglyceride lipase complementary deoxyribonucleic acid in poultry and expression of adipose triglyceride lipase during development of adipose in chickens. Poult Sci. 2009; 88(3):620-30. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00265. View

5.
Weisiger R . Cytosolic fatty acid binding proteins catalyze two distinct steps in intracellular transport of their ligands. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002; 239(1-2):35-43. View