» Articles » PMID: 28520870

Defining the Role of Estrogen Receptor β in the Regulation of Female Fertility

Abstract

Estrogens are essential hormones for the regulation of fertility. Cellular responses to estrogens are mediated by estrogen receptor α (ESR1) and estrogen receptor β (ESR2). In mouse and rat models, disruption of Esr1 causes infertility in both males and females. However, the role of ESR2 in reproductive function remains undecided because of a wide variation in phenotypic observations among Esr2-mutant mouse strains. Regulatory pathways independent of ESR2 binding to its cognate DNA response element have also been implicated in ESR2 signaling. To clarify the regulatory roles of ESR2, we generated two mutant rat models: one with a null mutation (exon 3 deletion, Esr2ΔE3) and the other with an inframe deletion selectively disrupting the DNA binding domain (exon 4 deletion, Esr2ΔE4). In both models, we observed that ESR2-mutant males were fertile. ESR2-mutant females exhibited regular estrous cycles and could be inseminated by wild-type (WT) males but did not become pregnant or pseudopregnant. Esr2-mutant ovaries were small and differed from WT ovaries by their absence of corpora lutea, despite the presence of follicles at various stages of development. Esr2ΔE3- and Esr2ΔE4-mutant females exhibited attenuated preovulatory gonadotropin surges and did not ovulate in response to a gonadotropin regimen effective in WT rats. Similarities of reproductive deficits in Esr2ΔE3 and Esr2ΔE4 mutants suggest that DNA binding-dependent transcriptional function of ESR2 is critical for preovulatory follicle maturation and ovulation. Overall, the findings indicate that neuroendocrine and ovarian deficits are linked to infertility observed in Esr2-mutant rats.

Citing Articles

Altered Expression of Epigenetic and Transcriptional Regulators in ERβ Knockout Rat Ovaries During Postnatal Development.

Vo K, Sharma Y, Chakravarthi V, Mohamadi R, Bahadursingh E, Mohamadi A Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859473 PMC: 11765817. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020760.


Effect of preconception antibiotics exposure on female reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alemu B, Wang C, Li L, Zhu Z, Li Q, Wang Y EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102935.

PMID: 39687430 PMC: 11647117. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102935.


Molecular approaches to mammalian uterine receptivity for conceptus implantation.

Kubota K J Reprod Dev. 2024; 70(4):207-212.

PMID: 38763760 PMC: 11310385. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2024-022.


ERβ Regulation of Indian Hedgehog Expression in the First Wave of Ovarian Follicles.

Chakravarthi V, Dilower I, Ghosh S, Borosha S, Mohamadi R, Dahiya V Cells. 2024; 13(7.

PMID: 38607081 PMC: 11011683. DOI: 10.3390/cells13070644.


Dynamic Expression of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Estrogen mRNA Receptors Associated with microRNAs and in Canine Follicles during the Estrous Cycle.

De Los Reyes M, Dettleff P, Palomino J, Peralta O, Vergara A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38254383 PMC: 10812696. DOI: 10.3390/ani14020214.


References
1.
Dow L, Lowe S . Life in the fast lane: mammalian disease models in the genomics era. Cell. 2012; 148(6):1099-109. PMC: 3410373. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.023. View

2.
Morani A, Barros R, Imamov O, Hultenby K, Arner A, Warner M . Lung dysfunction causes systemic hypoxia in estrogen receptor beta knockout (ERbeta-/-) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(18):7165-9. PMC: 1459034. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602194103. View

3.
Smith M, Freeman M, Neill J . The control of progesterone secretion during the estrous cycle and early pseudopregnancy in the rat: prolactin, gonadotropin and steroid levels associated with rescue of the corpus luteum of pseudopregnancy. Endocrinology. 1975; 96(1):219-26. DOI: 10.1210/endo-96-1-219. View

4.
Carroll J, Meyer C, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger T, Eeckhoute J . Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet. 2006; 38(11):1289-97. DOI: 10.1038/ng1901. View

5.
Wells K . Genetic engineering of mammals. Cell Tissue Res. 2015; 363(1):289-294. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-015-2321-6. View