» Articles » PMID: 28512536

Effect of Smear Clear and Some Other Commonly Used Irrigants on Dislodgement Resistance of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Root Dentin

Overview
Journal J Clin Exp Dent
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 May 18
PMID 28512536
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) to root canal dentin after irrigation with Smear Clear in comparison with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) and saline as commonly used root canal irrigants.

Material And Methods: The coronal and mid-root areas of maxillary anterior teeth were horizontally sectioned into one-millimeter thick slices. The root canal lumen of dentinal slices was dilated using a diamond bur with 1.3 mm diameter. After the application of MTA, the samples were incubated in 100% humidity for 10 minutes and were then randomly divided into four groups (n=20) and immersed in Smear Clear, 2.5% NaOCl, 2% CHX and saline for 30 minutes. No irrigant was used for the control group (n=20). A wet cotton pellet was placed on the samples and after 48 hours of incubation, push-out bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. The samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope to determine the mode of failure. One-way ANOVA was used to assess statistical differences among the groups.

Results: The control group showed the highest bond strength with significant differences with other groups (<0.05). Among the experimental groups, the saline group had no significant difference with CHX (P=0.09) but it had significant differences with Smear Clear and NaOCl groups (<0.05). No significant difference in bond strength to MTA was noted after irrigation with Smear Clear, CHX and NaOCl (>0.05). Other pairwise comparisons showed no significant difference (>0.05).

Conclusions: Irrigation with Smear Clear, CHX and NaOCl did not cause a significant change in bond strength of MTA to dentin. Root Canal Irrigants, push-out, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, dentin.

Citing Articles

An in-vitro assessment of the irrigants and irrigation protocols effect on the ProRoot MTA marginal leakage in the furcal perforations.

Dayyoub G, Al-Tayyan M, Alsayed Tolibah Y, Achour H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6319.

PMID: 39984576 PMC: 11845494. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90841-3.


How Irrigants Affect Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) Sealing in Furcal Perforations: An In Vitro Study.

Dayyoub G, Al-Tayyan M, Alsayed Tolibah Y, Achour H Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70690.

PMID: 39493031 PMC: 11530254. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70690.

References
1.
da Silva L, Sanguino A, Rocha C, Leonardo M, Silva R . Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth. J Endod. 2008; 34(12):1541-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.007. View

2.
Formosa L, Mallia B, Camilleri J . Push-out bond strength of MTA with antiwashout gel or resins. Int Endod J. 2013; 47(5):454-62. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12169. View

3.
Dunavant T, Regan J, Glickman G, Solomon E, Honeyman A . Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod. 2006; 32(6):527-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.001. View

4.
Smith J, Loushine R, Weller R, Rueggeberg F, Whitford G, Pashley D . Metrologic evaluation of the surface of white MTA after the use of two endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 2007; 33(4):463-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.002. View

5.
Collares F, Portella F, Rodrigues S, Celeste R, Leitune V, Samuel S . The influence of methodological variables on the push-out resistance to dislodgement of root filling materials: a meta-regression analysis. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(9):836-849. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12539. View