» Articles » PMID: 26331627

The Influence of Methodological Variables on the Push-out Resistance to Dislodgement of Root Filling Materials: a Meta-regression Analysis

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Sep 3
PMID 26331627
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of several methodological variables on the push-out resistance to dislodgment of root filling materials by a meta-regression analysis of the literature. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed database using the terms 'push-out' and 'pushout'. Laboratory studies published before March 2015 were included. Two reviewers extracted data regarding country of origin, year of publication, tooth type, smear layer removal, root canal sealer, core material, obturation technique, sample storage, tooth portion, test machine load velocity and slice thickness. Pooled mean resistance to dislodgement of all groups from the included studies was used in a linear meta-regression of random effects (α = 0.05). Of the 850 identified studies, 53 met the inclusion criteria. A meta-regression of the 341 groups extracted from these articles was performed to analyse the influence of each variable on resistance to dislodgement (in MPa). The sealer, core material, obturation technique, slice thickness, storage time, load velocity and tooth portion significantly influence the results (P < 0.05). Irrigant solution and smear layer removal did not influence the resistance to dislodgement of the root filling materials (P > 0.05). Methodological variables such as sealer, core material, root filling technique, tooth type, tooth portion, slice thickness, storage time and load velocity influenced the resistance to dislodgment. The inclusion and standardization of all related variables could lead to a more comparable and reproducible analysis of the resistance to dislodgment of the root canal sealers.

Citing Articles

The effect of different variables on push-out tests in 3D-printed oval and round-shaped root canals: a methodological study.

Gok T, Cankaya G, Sen B Acta Odontol Scand. 2025; 84:86-92.

PMID: 39945029 PMC: 11865676. DOI: 10.2340/aos.v84.42958.


Evaluation of the Effects of Retro-Cavity Preconditioning with or Without Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid on Root Surface pH and Dislodgement Resistance of NeoMTA2 and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Flow Retro-Fills: An Ex Vivo Investigation.

Khedmat S, Abaee S, Assadian H, Signore A, Benedicenti S J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39852559 PMC: 11766056. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16010003.


Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Merfea M, Cimpean S, Chiorean R, Antoniac A, Delean A, Badea I Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727454 PMC: 11675060. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120397.


Comparison between AH plus sealer and total fill bioceramic sealer performance in previously untreated and retreatment cases of maxillary incisors with large-sized periapical lesion: a randomized controlled trial.

Wahbi E, Achour H, Alsayed Tolibah Y BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):73.

PMID: 39266514 PMC: 11392944. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00256-x.


Effect of bioceramic intracanal medication on the dentinal bond strength of bioceramic cements: an study.

Almohareb R, Barakat R, Algahtani F, Almohaimel M, Alaraj D, Alotaibi N PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17826.

PMID: 39071126 PMC: 11283773. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17826.