» Articles » PMID: 28508427

Evaluation of Benefit and Tolerability of IQP-CL-101 (Xanthofen) in the Symptomatic Improvement of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Double-Blinded, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Phytother Res
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 May 17
PMID 28508427
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder of unknown aetiology. There is currently no known cure, and pharmacological interventions are usually targeting symptomatic relief, where natural and herbal remedies also play a role. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit and tolerability of IQP-CL-101 in symptomatic IBS relief. A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted over 8 weeks. A total of 99 subjects fulfilling ROME-III criteria for IBS were randomised into two groups, given either two IQP-CL-101 softgels or matching placebo twice daily before main meals. The primary endpoint was the difference in change of IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) after an 8-week intake of IQP-CL-101 compared to placebo. After 8 weeks, subjects on IQP-CL-101 showed a significant reduction in IBS-SSS (113.0 ± 64.9-point reduction) compared to subjects on placebo (38.7 ± 64.5-point reduction) (p < 0.001). A significant improvement could be seen as early as 4 weeks. No serious adverse events were reported throughout. IQP-CL-101 can be considered beneficial in the improvement of IBS symptom severity, regardless of IBS type, and therefore able to improve quality of life in patients suffering from abdominal pain and discomfort. © 2017 The Authors. Phytotherapy Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citing Articles

Placebo response variability on health-related quality of life outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome: an arm-based network meta-analysis.

Wang Z, Chen Y, Li X, Lin L, Chen B, Chen M Qual Life Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39998756 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-03927-w.


Herbal placebo response in clinical trials on irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huang K, Lv M, Zheng T, Wang F, Tang X, Lv L Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1475366.

PMID: 39669195 PMC: 11634590. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1475366.


How fragile the positive results of Chinese herbal medicine randomized controlled trials on irritable bowel syndrome are?.

Luo M, Huang J, Wang Y, Li Y, Liu Z, Liu M BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024; 24(1):300.

PMID: 39143474 PMC: 11323352. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-024-04561-8.


Exploring the gap: attitudes, knowledge, and training needs in complementary and integrative medicine among healthcare professionals at German university hospitals.

Hesmert D, Klocke C, Stolz R, Huber R, Samstag Y, Hubner K Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1408653.

PMID: 38784234 PMC: 11111851. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408653.


A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of turmeric in the treatment of digestive disorders.

Thavorn K, Wolfe D, Faust L, Shorr R, Akkawi M, Isaranuwatchai W Phytother Res. 2024; 38(6):2687-2706.

PMID: 38503513 PMC: 11168884. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.8189.


References
1.
Barbara G, De Giorgio R, Stanghellini V, Cremon C, Corinaldesi R . A role for inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome?. Gut. 2002; 51 Suppl 1:i41-4. PMC: 1867730. DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.suppl_1.i41. View

2.
Farthing M . Treatment options in irritable bowel syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004; 18(4):773-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.04.008. View

3.
Grigoleit H, Grigoleit P . Pharmacology and preclinical pharmacokinetics of peppermint oil. Phytomedicine. 2005; 12(8):612-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2004.10.007. View

4.
Talley N . Evaluation of drug treatment in irritable bowel syndrome. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 56(4):362-9. PMC: 1884360. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01966.x. View

5.
Ohman L, Simren M . New insights into the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Liver Dis. 2007; 39(3):201-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.10.014. View