» Articles » PMID: 28504898

Dissociable Contributions of Imagination and Willpower to the Malleability of Human Patience

Overview
Journal Psychol Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 May 16
PMID 28504898
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to exercise patience is important for human functioning. Although it is known that patience can be promoted by using top-down control, or willpower, to override impatient impulses, patience is also malleable-in particular, susceptible to framing effects-in ways that are difficult to explain using willpower alone. So far, the mechanisms underlying framing effects on patience have been elusive. We investigated the role of imagination in these effects. In a behavioral experiment (Experiment 1), a classic framing manipulation (sequence framing) increased self-reported and independently coded imagination during intertemporal choice. In an investigation of neural responses during decision making (Experiment 2), sequence framing increased the extent to which patience was related to activation in brain regions associated with imagination, relative to activation in regions associated with willpower, and increased functional connectivity of brain regions associated with imagination, but not willpower, relative to regions associated with valuation. Our results suggest that sequence framing can increase the role of imagination in decision making without increasing the exertion of willpower.

Citing Articles

Intertemporal choice reflects value comparison rather than self-control: insights from confidence judgements.

Bulley A, Lempert K, Conwell C, Irish M, Schacter D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1866):20210338.

PMID: 36314145 PMC: 9619231. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0338.


Willpower with and without effort.

Ainslie G Behav Brain Sci. 2020; 44:e30.

PMID: 32843105 PMC: 9280284. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X20000357.


Deliberating trade-offs with the future.

Bulley A, Schacter D Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(3):238-247.

PMID: 32184495 PMC: 7147875. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9.


Differential temporal salience of earning and saving.

Hu K, De Rosa E, Anderson A Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):2843.

PMID: 30030433 PMC: 6054624. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05201-9.

References
1.
Sasse L, Peters J, Buchel C, Brassen S . Effects of prospective thinking on intertemporal choice: The role of familiarity. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015; 36(10):4210-21. PMC: 6869307. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22912. View

2.
Lebreton M, Bertoux M, Boutet C, Lehericy S, Dubois B, Fossati P . A critical role for the hippocampus in the valuation of imagined outcomes. PLoS Biol. 2013; 11(10):e1001684. PMC: 3805472. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001684. View

3.
Lieberman M, Cunningham W . Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009; 4(4):423-8. PMC: 2799956. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp052. View

4.
Martin V, Schacter D, Corballis M, Addis D . A role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(33):13858-63. PMC: 3158230. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1105816108. View

5.
Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson E, Krosch A, Lisanby S, Fehr E . Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13(5):538-9. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2516. View