» Articles » PMID: 28500580

Is Right Colectomy a Complete Learning Procedure for a Robotic Surgical Program?

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 May 14
PMID 28500580
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study analyses the utility of right colectomy as a learning procedure at the beginning of a robotic surgical program. The hypothesis is that right colectomy contains all the technical steps necessary to acquire basic abilities in robotics surgery. The first 23 consecutive robotic right colectomy performed at the beginning of a robotic program were analysed. All surgical times were recorded in the operating room and second checked on a dedicated video-database. Specific robotic times were analysed using CUSUM method to evaluate the learning curve. CUSUM-derived learning phases were compared. Fourteen males and nine females with a mean age of 68.7 (46-84) underwent robotic right colectomy. The mean overall time was 265.3 min (180-320 min), docking time was 7 min (5-12 min), console time was 205.9 min (145-260 min), and anastomotic time was 43.6 (25-60 min). CUSUM analyses identified two learning phases: "starting phase" and "consolidation phase". Interphase comparison confirmed the significant (p < 0.05) differences between the two phases. Robotic technology facilitates the training process in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. At the beginning of the learning curve, right colectomy could represent a complete procedure to be proficient in robotic colorectal surgery.

Citing Articles

Proposal of set-up standardization for general surgery procedures with the CMR Versius system, a new robotic platform: our initial experience.

Pisani Ceretti A, Mariani N, Perego M, Giovenzana M, Salaj A, Formisano G Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024; 409(1):107.

PMID: 38565787 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03291-2.


The deconstructed procedural description in robotic colorectal surgery.

Larkins K, Quirke N, Ong H, Mohamed J, Heriot A, Warrier S J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):147.

PMID: 38554192 PMC: 10981632. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01907-9.


A systematic review of robotic surgery curricula using a contemporary educational framework.

Rahimi A, Ho K, Chang M, Gasper D, Ashouri Y, Dearmon-Moore D Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(4):2833-2841.

PMID: 36481821 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09788-5.


Minimally invasive colorectal surgery learning curve.

Vanella S, Coppola Bottazzi E, Farese G, Murano R, Noviello A, Palma T World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022; 14(11):731-736.

PMID: 36438877 PMC: 9693684. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i11.731.


The Learning Curve of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 76 Cases at a Single Center.

Huang P, Li S, Li P, Jia B Front Surg. 2022; 9:897103.

PMID: 35846959 PMC: 9276975. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.897103.


References
1.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Carmichael J, Mills S, Pigazzi A, Nguyen N, Stamos M . Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58(10):950-6. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000448. View

2.
Gruber K, Soliman A, Schmid K, Rettig B, Ryan J, Watanabe-Galloway S . Disparities in the Utilization of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer in Rural Nebraska: A Call for Placement and Training of Rural General Surgeons. J Rural Health. 2015; 31(4):392-400. PMC: 4592370. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12120. View

3.
Tsai K, Kiu K, Huang M, Wu C, Chang T . The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer at a new regional hospital. Asian J Surg. 2015; 39(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.03.008. View

4.
Lim D, Min B, Kim M, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H . Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(4):1379-85. PMC: 3599163. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2619-3. View

5.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop W, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer H . Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(7):477-84. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7. View