» Articles » PMID: 28499433

ServAR: An Augmented Reality Tool to Guide the Serving of Food

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 May 14
PMID 28499433
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of food portion size is a difficult task. Visual cues are important mediators of portion size and therefore technology-based aids may assist consumers when serving and estimating food portions. The current study evaluated the usability and impact on estimation error of standard food servings of a novel augmented reality food serving aid, ServAR.

Methods: Participants were randomised into one of three groups: 1) no information/aid (control); 2) verbal information on standard serving sizes; or 3) ServAR, an aid which overlayed virtual food servings over a plate using a tablet computer. Participants were asked to estimate the standard serving sizes of nine foods (broccoli, carrots, cauliflower, green beans, kidney beans, potato, pasta, rice, and sweetcorn) using validated food replicas. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared median served weights of each food to reference standard serving size weights. Percentage error was used to compare the estimation of serving size accuracy between the three groups. All participants also performed a usability test using the ServAR tool to guide the serving of one randomly selected food.

Results: Ninety adults (78.9% female; a mean (95%CI) age 25.8 (24.9-26.7) years; BMI 24.2 (23.2-25.2) kg/m) completed the study. The median servings were significantly different to the reference portions for five foods in the ServAR group, compared to eight foods in the information only group and seven foods for the control group. The cumulative proportion of total estimations per group within ±10%, ±25% and ±50% of the reference portion was greater for those using ServAR (30.7, 65.2 and 90.7%; respectively), compared to the information only group (19.6, 47.4 and 77.4%) and control group (10.0, 33.7 and 68.9%). Participants generally found the ServAR tool easy to use and agreed that it showed potential to support optimal portion size selection. However, some refinements to the ServAR tool are required to improve the user experience.

Conclusions: Use of the augmented reality tool improved accuracy and consistency of estimating standard serve sizes compared to the information only and control conditions. ServAR demonstrates potential as a practical tool to guide the serving of food. Further evaluation across a broad range of foods, portion sizes and settings is warranted.

Citing Articles

COVID-19 and Virtual Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Integrating Digital Food Models for Interactive Portion Size Education.

Ho D, Lee Y, Chiu W, Shen Y, Yao C, Chu H Nutrients. 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36014819 PMC: 9415904. DOI: 10.3390/nu14163313.


Evaluating augmented reality for 'real life' teaching of food portion concepts.

Mellos I, Probst Y J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022; 35(6):1245-1254.

PMID: 35419898 PMC: 9790224. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13016.


A Comprehensive Survey of Image-Based Food Recognition and Volume Estimation Methods for Dietary Assessment.

Tahir G, Loo C Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9(12).

PMID: 34946400 PMC: 8700885. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9121676.


Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vargas-Alvarez M, Navas-Carretero S, Palla L, Martinez J, Almiron-Roig E Nutrients. 2021; 13(6).

PMID: 34207492 PMC: 8229078. DOI: 10.3390/nu13061978.


Usability of Food Size Aids in Mobile Dietary Reporting Apps for Young Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Liu Y, Wu S, Lin S, Chen C, Lin Y, Chen H JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(4):e14543.

PMID: 32347805 PMC: 7221647. DOI: 10.2196/14543.


References
1.
Ball G, Friedman A . Dice, golf balls, and CDs: assumptions about portion size measurement aids. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2010; 71(3):146-9. DOI: 10.3148/71.3.2010.146. View

2.
Lee C, Chae J, Schap T, Kerr D, Delp E, Ebert D . Comparison of known food weights with image-based portion-size automated estimation and adolescents' self-reported portion size. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6(2):428-34. PMC: 3380789. DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600231. View

3.
OBrien S, Livingstone M, McNulty B, Lyons J, Walton J, Flynn A . Secular trends in reported portion size of food and beverages consumed by Irish adults. Br J Nutr. 2015; 113(7):1148-57. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515000276. View

4.
Poelman M, de Vet E, Velema E, de Boer M, Seidell J, Steenhuis I . PortionControl@HOME: results of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a multi-component portion size intervention on portion control behavior and body mass index. Ann Behav Med. 2014; 49(1):18-28. PMC: 4335123. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-014-9637-4. View

5.
Spence M, Livingstone M, Hollywood L, Gibney E, OBrien S, Kirsty Pourshahidi L . A qualitative study of psychological, social and behavioral barriers to appropriate food portion size control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:92. PMC: 3734152. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-92. View