» Articles » PMID: 28497363

Spatial Updating Strategy Affects the Reference Frame in Path Integration

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 May 13
PMID 28497363
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated how spatial updating strategies affected the selection of reference frames in path integration. Participants walked an outbound path consisting of three successive waypoints in a featureless environment and then pointed to the first waypoint. We manipulated the alignment of participants' final heading at the end of the outbound path with their initial heading to examine the adopted reference frame. We assumed that the initial heading defined the principal reference direction in an allocentric reference frame. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to use a configural updating strategy and to monitor the shape of the outbound path while they walked it. Pointing performance was best when the final heading was aligned with the initial heading, indicating the use of an allocentric reference frame. In Experiment 2, participants were instructed to use a continuous updating strategy and to keep track of the location of the first waypoint while walking the outbound path. Pointing performance was equivalent regardless of the alignment between the final and the initial headings, indicating the use of an egocentric reference frame. These results confirmed that people could employ different spatial updating strategies in path integration (Wiener, Berthoz, & Wolbers Experimental Brain Research 208(1) 61-71, 2011), and suggested that these strategies could affect the selection of the reference frame for path integration.

Citing Articles

A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.

He Q, Liu J, Eschapasse L, Beveridge E, Brown T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13923.

PMID: 35978035 PMC: 9385652. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18245-1.


Cue combination in goal-oriented navigation.

Qi Y, Mou W, Lei X Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021; 74(11):1981-2001.

PMID: 33885351 PMC: 8902265. DOI: 10.1177/17470218211015796.


A computational cognitive model of judgments of relative direction.

Newman P, Cox G, McNamara T Cognition. 2021; 209:104559.

PMID: 33388527 PMC: 8205961. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104559.


Self-reported navigation ability is associated with optic flow-sensitive regions' functional connectivity patterns during visual path integration.

Zajac L, Burte H, Taylor H, Killiany R Brain Behav. 2019; 9(4):e01236.

PMID: 30884216 PMC: 6456774. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1236.


Selective resetting position and heading estimations while driving in a large-scale immersive virtual environment.

Zhang L, Mou W Exp Brain Res. 2018; 237(2):335-350.

PMID: 30406817 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5417-x.


References
1.
Chen X, He Q, Kelly J, Fiete I, McNamara T . Bias in Human Path Integration Is Predicted by Properties of Grid Cells. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(13):1771-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.031. View

2.
Wang R . Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 23(3):692-702. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0952-y. View

3.
Kelly J, Avraamides M, Loomis J . Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(6):1092-107. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1092. View

4.
Gramann K, Muller H, Eick E, Schonebeck B . Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005; 31(6):1199-1223. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1199. View

5.
TOLMAN E . Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev. 1948; 55(4):189-208. DOI: 10.1037/h0061626. View