» Articles » PMID: 30042665

Extrahippocampal Contributions to Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Ability

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2018 Jul 26
PMID 30042665
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Age-related decline in spatial navigation is well-known and the extant literature emphasizes the important contributions of a hippocampus-dependent spatial navigation system in mediating this decline. However, navigation is a multifaceted cognitive domain and some aspects of age-related navigational decline may be mediated by extrahippocampal brain regions and/or systems. The current review presents an overview of some key cognitive domains that contribute to the age-related changes in spatial navigation ability, and elucidates such domains in the context of an increased engagement of navigationally relevant extrahippocampal brain regions with advancing age. Specifically, this review focuses on age-related declines in three main areas: (i) allocentric strategy use and switching between egocentric and allocentric strategies, (ii) associative learning of landmarks/locations and heading directions, and (iii) executive functioning and attention. Thus far, there is accumulating neuroimaging evidence supporting the functional relevance of the striatum for egocentric/response strategy use in older adults, and of the prefrontal cortex for mediating executive functions that contribute to successful navigational performance. Notably, the functional role of the prefrontal cortex was particularly emphasized via the proposed relevance of the fronto-locus coeruleus noradrenergic system for strategy switching and of the fronto-hippocampal circuit for landmark-direction associative learning. In view of these putative prefrontal contributions to navigation-related functions, we recommend future spatial navigation studies to adopt a systems-oriented approach that investigates age-related alterations in the interaction between the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus, and extrahippocampal regions, as well as an individual differences approach that clarifies the differential engagement of prefrontal executive processes among older adults.

Citing Articles

Less spatial exploration is associated with poorer spatial memory in midlife adults.

Puthusseryppady V, Cossio D, Yu S, Rezwana F, Hegarty M, Jacobs E Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1382801.

PMID: 38919601 PMC: 11196421. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1382801.


Large-scale coupling of prefrontal activity patterns as a mechanism for cognitive control in health and disease: evidence from rodent models.

Negron-Oyarzo I, Dib T, Chacana-Veliz L, Lopez-Quilodran N, Urrutia-Pinones J Front Neural Circuits. 2024; 18:1286111.

PMID: 38638163 PMC: 11024307. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1286111.


Grid cells: the missing link in understanding Parkinson's disease?.

Reinshagen A Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1276714.

PMID: 38389787 PMC: 10881698. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1276714.


Enhancing spatial navigation skills in mild cognitive impairment patients: a usability study of a new version of ANTaging software.

Stramba-Badiale C, Tuena C, Goulene K, Cipresso P, Morelli S, Rossi M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 17:1310375.

PMID: 38259329 PMC: 10801043. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1310375.


Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with cortical thickness of medial temporal brain areas associated with spatial cognition in young but not older adults.

Rosario M, Kern K, Mumtaz S, Storer T, Schon K Eur J Neurosci. 2023; 59(1):82-100.

PMID: 38056827 PMC: 10979765. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16200.


References
1.
Moffat S . Aging and spatial navigation: what do we know and where do we go?. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009; 19(4):478-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-009-9120-3. View

2.
Bouret S, Sara S . Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function. Trends Neurosci. 2005; 28(11):574-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2005.09.002. View

3.
Driscoll I, Hamilton D, Yeo R, Brooks W, Sutherland R . Virtual navigation in humans: the impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Horm Behav. 2005; 47(3):326-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.013. View

4.
Zhong J, Moffat S . Age-Related Differences in Associative Learning of Landmarks and Heading Directions in a Virtual Navigation Task. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016; 8:122. PMC: 4882336. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00122. View

5.
Colombo D, Serino S, Tuena C, Pedroli E, Dakanalis A, Cipresso P . Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 80:605-621. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.012. View