» Articles » PMID: 28494143

Normal Meal Tolerance Test is Preferable to the Glucagon Stimulation Test in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes That Are Not in a Hyperglycemic State: Comparison with the Change of C-peptide Immunoreactivity

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2017 May 12
PMID 28494143
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the properties of the glucagon stimulation test (GST) and the normal meal tolerance test (NMTT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials And Methods: We enrolled 142 patients with type 2 diabetes, and carried out a GST and a NMTT. We carried out the NMTT using a calorie-controlled meal based on an intake of 30 kcal/kg ideal bodyweight/day. We calculated the change in C-peptide immunoreactivity (ΔCPR) by subtracting fasting CPR from the CPR 6 min after the 1-mg glucagon injection (GST) or 120 min after the meal (NMTT).

Results: Mean ΔCPR for the GST was 2.0 ng/mL, and for the NMTT was 3.1 ng/mL. A total of 104 patients had greater ΔCPR in the NMTT than the GST, and the mean ΔCPR was significantly greater in the NMTT than the GST (P < 0.05). To exclude any influence of antidiabetic drugs, we examined 42 individuals not taking antidiabetic agents, and found the mean ΔCPR was significantly greater in the NMTT than the GST (GST 2.4 ng/mL, NMTT 4.3 ng/mL; P < 0.05). To consider the influence of glucose toxicity, we carried out receiver operating characteristic analyses with fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin. The optimal cut-off levels predicting GST ΔCPR to be larger than NMTT ΔCPR were fasting plasma glucose 147 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin 9.0% (fasting plasma glucose: sensitivity 0.64, specificity 0.76, area under the curve 0.73; glycated hemoglobin: sensitivity 0.56, specificity 0.71, area under the curve 0.66).

Conclusions: The NMTT is a reliable insulin secretion test in patients with type 2 diabetes, except for those in a hyperglycemic state.

Citing Articles

The effects of early short-term insulin treatment vs. glimepiride on beta cell function in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes with HbA1c above 9.

Stojanovic J, Andjelic-Jelic M, Vuksanovic M, Marjanovic-Petkovic M, Jojic B, Stojanovic M Turk J Med Sci. 2023; 53(2):552-562.

PMID: 37476884 PMC: 10387975. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5616.


The characteristics of postprandial glycemic response patterns to white rice and glucose in healthy adults: Identifying subgroups by clustering analysis.

Liu A, Fan Z, Lu X, Wu Y, Zhao W, Lou X Front Nutr. 2022; 9:977278.

PMID: 36386904 PMC: 9659901. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.977278.


Processing Alaska Pollock Protein () into Kamaboko Protein Mitigates Elevated Serum Cholesterol and Postprandial Glucose Levels in Obese Zucker Rats.

Takada N, Hosomi R, Fukunaga K Foods. 2022; 11(21).

PMID: 36360046 PMC: 9653929. DOI: 10.3390/foods11213434.


Effects of mixed meal tolerance test on gastric emptying, glucose and lipid homeostasis in obese nonhuman primates.

Albarazanji K, Nawrocki A, Gao B, Wang X, Wang Y, Xiao Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):11866.

PMID: 34088949 PMC: 8178340. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91027-3.


Characteristics of patients who developed glucose intolerance in the early period after partial pancreatectomy.

Sera N, Nakamura T, Horie I, Higashi R, Tominaga R, Yamamoto H Diabetol Int. 2021; 12(1):140-144.

PMID: 33479591 PMC: 7790964. DOI: 10.1007/s13340-020-00440-y.


References
1.
Youden W . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950; 3(1):32-5. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3. View

2.
Besser R, Jones A, McDonald T, Shields B, Knight B, Hattersley A . The impact of insulin administration during the mixed meal tolerance test. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(10):1279-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03649.x. View

3.
Kashiwagi A, Kasuga M, Araki E, Oka Y, Hanafusa T, Ito H . International clinical harmonization of glycated hemoglobin in Japan: From Japan Diabetes Society to National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program values. J Diabetes Investig. 2014; 3(1):39-40. PMC: 4014931. DOI: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2012.00207.x. View

4.
Palmer J, Fleming G, Greenbaum C, Herold K, Jansa L, Kolb H . C-peptide is the appropriate outcome measure for type 1 diabetes clinical trials to preserve beta-cell function: report of an ADA workshop, 21-22 October 2001. Diabetes. 2003; 53(1):250-64. DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.53.1.250. View

5.
Rossetti L, Giaccari A, DeFronzo R . Glucose toxicity. Diabetes Care. 1990; 13(6):610-30. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.13.6.610. View