» Articles » PMID: 28490934

Factors Influencing Treatment Selection and Survival in Advanced Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 May 12
PMID 28490934
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Despite numerous breakthrough therapies, inoperable lung cancer still places a heavy burden on patients who might not be candidates for chemotherapy. To identify potential candidates for the newly emerging immunotherapy-based treatment paradigms, we explored the clinical and biologic factors affecting treatment decisions.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed at our university-affiliated cancer centre between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Patient demographics, systemic treatment, and survival were examined.

Results: During the 3-year study period, 683 patients fitting the inclusion criteria were identified. First-line therapy was administered in 49.5% of patients; only 22.4% received further lines of therapy. The main reasons for withholding therapy were poor performance status [ps (43.2%)], rapidly deteriorating ps (31.9%), patient refusal of therapy (20.9%), and associated comorbidities (4%). Older age, the presence of brain metastasis at diagnosis, and non-small-cell histology were also associated with therapeutic restraint. Oncology referrals were infrequent in patients who did not receive therapy (32.2%). Older patients and those with a poor ps experienced superior survival when treatment was administered (hazard ratio: 0.25; 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 0.38; and hazard ratio: 0.44; 95% confidence interval: 0.23 to 0.87 respectively; < 0.001).

Conclusions: Advanced lung cancer still poses a therapeutic challenge, with a high proportion of patients being deemed unfit for therapy. This issue cannot be resolved until appropriate measures are taken to ensure the inclusion of older patients and those with a relatively poor ps in large clinical trials. Immunotherapy might be interesting in this setting, given that it appears to be more tolerable. Another consequential undertaking would be the deployment of strategies to reduce wait times during the diagnostic process for patients with a high index of suspicion for lung cancer.

Citing Articles

Patterns of care and survival for lung cancer: Results of the European population-based high-resolution study.

Sant M, Daidone C, Innos K, Marcos-Gragera R, Vanschoenbeek K, Barranco M Front Epidemiol. 2024; 3:1109853.

PMID: 38455923 PMC: 10910949. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1109853.


Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers.

Chang W, Lai A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):464.

PMID: 38172343 PMC: 10764847. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51161-0.


Clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in treatment of first line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics.

Liu W, Huo G, Chen P BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):458.

PMID: 37202730 PMC: 10197372. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10959-3.


Lung cancer in Asian Indian females: Identification of disease-specific characteristics and outcome measures over a 12-year period.

Iyer H, Ghosh T, Garg A, Agarwal H, Jain D, Pandey R Lung India. 2023; 40(1):4-11.

PMID: 36695252 PMC: 9894289. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_43_22.


Clinical profile of small-cell lung cancer in North India: A 12-year analysis from a tertiary care center.

Iyer H, Ghosh T, Agarwal H, Garg A, Pandey R, Jain D Lung India. 2023; 39(6):495-501.

PMID: 36629227 PMC: 9746269. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_48_22.


References
1.
Dajczman E, Kasymjanova G, Kreisman H, Swinton N, Pepe C, Small D . Should patient-rated performance status affect treatment decisions in advanced lung cancer?. J Thorac Oncol. 2008; 3(10):1133-6. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318186a272. View

2.
Wojcik E, Rychlik U, Stasik Z, Kulpa J, Reinfuss M, Skotnicki P . [Prognostic value of laboratory factors of performance status in lung cancer patients]. Przegl Lek. 2010; 66(8):424-32. View

3.
Gwilliam B, Keeley V, Todd C, Roberts C, Gittins M, Kelly L . Prognosticating in patients with advanced cancer--observational study comparing the accuracy of clinicians' and patients' estimates of survival. Ann Oncol. 2012; 24(2):482-488. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds341. View

4.
Lilenbaum R . Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in special populations. Oncology (Williston Park). 2004; 18(10):1321-5. View

5.
Leong S, Toh C, Lim W, Lin X, Tan S, Poon D . A randomized phase II trial of single-agent gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have poor performance status and/or are elderly. J Thorac Oncol. 2007; 2(3):230-6. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318031d06f. View