» Articles » PMID: 28488024

Glioma Grading and Determination of IDH Mutation Status and ATRX Loss by DCE and ASL Perfusion

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2017 May 11
PMID 28488024
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion in glioma grading according to the previous WHO classification of 2007, as well as concerning isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status and ATRX expression as required by the new WHO 2016 brain tumor classification.

Methods: The mean values of Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp by DCE perfusion, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) by ASL perfusion were assessed retrospectively in 40 patients with initial glioma diagnosis. Perfusion parameters were correlated and compared concerning glioma grading, IDH mutation status and ATRX expression.

Results: The DCE and ASL perfusion parameters showed merely moderate correlation. The Ktrans, Ve, and CBF by DCE perfusion were different in low-grade and high-grade gliomas (p = 0.0018, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0038, respectively). Ve was useful in distinguishing high-grade from low-grade gliomas (p = 0.024, sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.80). CBF by ASL perfusion enabled discrimination of astrocytomas with and without IDH mutation (p = 0.014, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.88) and showed a trend for the discrimination of astrocytomas with IDH mutation from oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.074).

Conclusion: In conclusion, DCE and ASL perfusion are complementary in the differentiation of gliomas. The discrimination of low- and high-grade gliomas is possible by the DCE perfusion parameter Ve, while ASL perfusion shows potential for the differentiation of the IDH and ATRX mutation status of gliomas following the new WHO classification 2016. Both perfusion techniques might represent different aspects of brain tumor perfusion.

Citing Articles

Distributed parameter model of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the identification of IDH mutation, 1p19q codeletion, and tumor cell proliferation in glioma patients.

Zhao K, Huang H, Gao E, Qi J, Chen T, Zhao G Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1333798.

PMID: 39525622 PMC: 11544007. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1333798.


Evaluation of an Image-based Classification Model to Identify Glioma Subtypes Using Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion MRI On the Publicly Available UCSF Glioma Dataset.

Amador K, Kniep H, Fiehler J, Forkert N, Lindner T Clin Neuroradiol. 2024; 35(1):151-158.

PMID: 39419847 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-024-01465-5.


Machine learning-based nomogram for distinguishing between supratentorial extraventricular ependymoma and supratentorial glioblastoma.

Chen L, Chen W, Tang C, Li Y, Wu M, Tang L Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1443913.

PMID: 39319054 PMC: 11420638. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1443913.


Glioma Type Prediction with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging-A Standardized Multicenter Study.

Zerweck L, Hauser T, Klose U, Han T, Nagele T, Shen M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123372 PMC: 11311685. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152644.


Review of tracer kinetic models in evaluation of gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.

Zhou J, Hou Z, Tian C, Zhu Z, Ye M, Chen S Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1380793.

PMID: 38947892 PMC: 11211364. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1380793.


References
1.
Guo J, Yao C, Chen H, Zhuang D, Tang W, Ren G . The relationship between Cho/NAA and glioma metabolism: implementation for margin delineation of cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012; 154(8):1361-70. PMC: 3407558. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1418-x. View

2.
Dunn G, Andronesi O, Cahill D . From genomics to the clinic: biological and translational insights of mutant IDH1/2 in glioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2013; 34(2):E2. DOI: 10.3171/2012.12.FOCUS12355. View

3.
Louis D, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee W . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131(6):803-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. View

4.
Turkalp Z, Karamchandani J, Das S . IDH mutation in glioma: new insights and promises for the future. JAMA Neurol. 2014; 71(10):1319-25. DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1205. View

5.
Venneti S, Huse J . The evolving molecular genetics of low-grade glioma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015; 22(2):94-101. PMC: 4667550. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000049. View