» Articles » PMID: 28483960

Resistance Selection in Shigella Flexneri by Azithromycin, Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2017 May 10
PMID 28483960
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

continues to be a major cause of diarrhea-associated illness, and increasing resistance to first-line antimicrobials complicates the treatment of infections caused by this pathogen. We investigated the pharmacodynamics of current antimicrobial treatments for shigellosis to determine the likelihood of resistance promotion with continued global antimicrobial use. The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) and mutant selection window (MSW) were determined for azithromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against a wild-type strain of (ATCC 12022) and an isogenic mutant (m-12022). Time-kill assays were performed to determine antimicrobial killing. Concentrations of approved doses of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin are predicted to surpass the MPC for a majority of the dosage interval against ATCC 12022. However, against m-12022, concentrations of all fluoroquinolones are predicted to fall below the MPC and remain in the MSW for a majority of the dosage interval. Concentrations of ceftriaxone fall within the MSW for the majority of the dosage interval for both strains. All agents other than azithromycin displayed bactericidal activity in time-kill assays. Results of pharmacodynamic analyses suggest that all tested fluoroquinolones would achieve a favorable area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MPC ratio for ATCC 12022 and would restrict selective enrichment of mutants but that mutant selection in m-12022 would be likely if ciprofloxacin were used. Based on pharmacodynamic analyses, azithromycin and ceftriaxone are predicted to promote mutant selection in both strains. Confirmation of these findings and examination of novel treatment regimens using studies are warranted.

Citing Articles

Drug Combinations to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance: Various Correlations and Laws, and Their Verifications, Thus Proposing Some Principles and a Preliminary Scheme.

Yi H, Yuan G, Li S, Xu X, Guan Y, Zhang L Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(10).

PMID: 36289938 PMC: 9598766. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11101279.


Mutations in play an important role in ciprofloxacin-resistant .

Feng X, Zhang Z, Li X, Song Y, Kang J, Yin D Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12:261-272.

PMID: 30804676 PMC: 6371945. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S182272.


Evaluation of Shigella Species Azithromycin CLSI Epidemiological Cutoff Values and Macrolide Resistance Genes.

Salah M, Shtayeh I, Ghneim R, Al-Qass R, Sabateen A, Marzouqa H J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57(4).

PMID: 30700507 PMC: 6440796. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01422-18.

References
1.
Croisier D, Etienne M, Bergoin E, Charles P, Lequeu C, Piroth L . Mutant selection window in levofloxacin and moxifloxacin treatments of experimental pneumococcal pneumonia in a rabbit model of human therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48(5):1699-707. PMC: 400524. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1699-1707.2004. View

2.
Srinivasa H, Baijayanti M, Raksha Y . Magnitude of drug resistant Shigellosis: a report from Bangalore. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009; 27(4):358-60. DOI: 10.4103/0255-0857.55460. View

3.
Klontz E, Das S, Ahmed D, Ahmed S, Chisti M, Malek M . Long-term comparison of antibiotic resistance in Vibrio cholerae O1 and Shigella species between urban and rural Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58(9):e133-6. PMC: 3982837. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu040. View

4.
Zuckerman J, Qamar F, Bono B . Macrolides, ketolides, and glycylcyclines: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, tigecycline. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009; 23(4):997-1026, ix-x. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.013. View

5.
Klontz K, Singh N . Treatment of drug-resistant Shigella infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014; 13(1):69-80. DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.983902. View