» Articles » PMID: 28481656

Multiple Naloxone Administrations Among Emergency Medical Service Providers is Increasing

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Emergency Medicine
Date 2017 May 9
PMID 28481656
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Opioid overdoses are at epidemic levels in the United States. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) providers may administer naloxone to restore patient breathing and prevent respiratory arrest. There was a need for contemporary data to examine the number of naloxone administrations in an EMS encounter.

Methods: Using data from the National Emergency Medical Services Information System, we examined data from 2012-5 to determine trends in patients receiving multiple naloxone administrations (MNAs). Logistic regression including demographic, clinical, and operational information was used to examine factors associated with MNA.

Results: Among all events where naloxone was administered only 16.7% of the 911 calls specifically identified the medical emergency as a drug ingestion or poisoning event. The percentage of patients receiving MNA increased from 14.5% in 2012 to 18.2% in 2015, which represents a 26% increase in MNA in 4 years. Patients aged 20-29 had the highest percentage of MNA (21.1%). Patients in the Northeast and the Midwest had the highest relative MNA (Chi Squared = 539.5, p < 0.01 and Chi Squared = 351.2, p < 0.01, respectively). The logistic regression model showed that the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for MNA were greatest among people who live in the Northeast (aOR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.13-1.22) and for men (aOR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10-1.16), but lower for suburban and rural areas (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.72-0.80 and aOR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.80-0.89) and lowest for wilderness areas (aOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.68-0.84). Higher adjusted odds of MNA occurred when an advanced life support (ALS 2) level of service was provided compared to basic life support (BLS) ambulances (aOR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.45-3.16) and when the dispatch complaint indicated there was a drug poisoning event (aOR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.09-1.16). Reported layperson naloxone administration prior to EMS arrival was rare (1%).

Conclusion: This study shows that frequency of MNA is growing over time and is regionally dependent. MNA may be a barometer of the potency of the opioid involved in the overdose. The increase in MNA provides support for a dosage review. Better identification of opioid related events in the dispatch system could lead to a better match of services with patient needs.

Citing Articles

Time Course of Reversal of Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in Healthy Subjects by Intramuscular Nalmefene and Intramuscular and Intranasal Naloxone.

Cipriano A, Apseloff G, Kapil R, He E, Shet M, Harris S J Clin Pharmacol. 2024; 65(2):206-216.

PMID: 39347921 PMC: 11771590. DOI: 10.1002/jcph.6132.


Monoclonal Antibodies Engineered with Fc Region Mutations to Extend Protection against Fentanyl Toxicity.

Khaimraj A, Baehr C, Hicks D, Raleigh M, Pravetoni M J Immunol. 2024; 213(5):663-668.

PMID: 39018496 PMC: 11333160. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2400170.


Whole body physiology model to simulate respiratory depression of fentanyl and associated naloxone reversal.

Baird A, White S, Das R, Tatum N, Bisgaard E Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):114.

PMID: 38866911 PMC: 11169242. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00536-5.


At-risk patient documentation and naloxone dispersal for a rural statewide EMS "Naloxone Leave Behind" program.

Naumann J, Benson J, Lamberson M, Hunt S, Moran W, Stevens M J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024; 5(3):e13186.

PMID: 38766594 PMC: 11099750. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13186.


High-dose naloxone formulations are not as essential as we thought.

Lemen P, Garrett D, Thompson E, Aho M, Vasquez C, Park J Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):93.

PMID: 38741224 PMC: 11089786. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00994-z.


References
1.
Rudd R, Aleshire N, Zibbell J, Gladden R . Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 64(50-51):1378-82. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3. View

2.
Lyapustina T, Rutkow L, Chang H, Daubresse M, Ramji A, Faul M . Effect of a "pill mill" law on opioid prescribing and utilization: The case of Texas. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 159:190-7. PMC: 4976392. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.025. View

3.
Mann N, Kane L, Dai M, Jacobson K . Description of the 2012 NEMSIS public-release research dataset. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014; 19(2):232-40. DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959219. View

4.
Davis C, Ruiz S, Glynn P, Picariello G, Walley A . Expanded access to naloxone among firefighters, police officers, and emergency medical technicians in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2014; 104(8):e7-9. PMC: 4103249. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302062. View

5.
Willman M, Liss D, Schwarz E, Mullins M . Do heroin overdose patients require observation after receiving naloxone?. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016; 55(2):81-87. DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1253846. View