» Articles » PMID: 34446026

A Drug-related Good Samaritan Law and Calling Emergency Medical Services for Drug Overdoses in a Canadian Setting

Overview
Journal Harm Reduct J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Pharmacology
Psychiatry
Date 2021 Aug 27
PMID 34446026
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: People who use drugs (PWUD) are known to fear calling emergency medical services (EMS) for drug overdoses. In response, drug-related Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) have been widely adopted in the USA and Canada to encourage bystanders to call emergency medical services (EMS) in the event of a drug overdose. However, the effect of GSLs on EMS-calling behaviours has been understudied. We sought to identify factors associated with EMS-calling, including the enactment of the Canadian GSL in May 2017, among PWUD in Vancouver, Canada, a setting with an ongoing overdose crisis.

Methods: Data were derived from three prospective cohort studies of PWUD in Vancouver in 2014-2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with EMS-calling among PWUD who witnessed an overdose event. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis was employed to assess the impact of GSL on monthly prevalence of EMS-calling.

Results: Among 540 eligible participants, 321 (59%) were males and 284 (53%) reported calling EMS. In multivariable analysis, ever having administered naloxone three or more times (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-3.74) and residence in the Downtown Eastside (DTES) neighbourhood of Vancouver (AOR 1.96; 95% CI 1.23-3.13) were positively associated with EMS-calling, while living in a single occupancy hotel (SRO) was negatively associated with EMS-calling (AOR 0.51; 95% CI 0.30-0.86). The post-GSL enactment period was not associated with EMS-calling (AOR 0.81; 95% CI 0.52-1.25). The ITS found no significant difference in the monthly prevalence of EMS-calling between pre- and post-GSL enactment periods.

Conclusion: We observed EMS being called about half the time and the GSL did not appear to encourage EMS-calling. We also found that individuals living in SROs were less likely to call EMS, which raises concern given that fatal overdose cases are concentrated in SROs in our setting. The link between many naloxone administrations and EMS-calling could indicate that those with prior experience in responding to overdose events were more willing to call EMS. Increased efforts are warranted to ensure effective emergency responses for drug overdoses among PWUD.

Citing Articles

Characterizing and responding to stimulant overdoses: Findings from a mixed methods study of people who use cocaine and other stimulants in New England.

Hughto J, Kelly P, Vento S, Pletta D, Noh M, Silcox J Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024; 266:112501.

PMID: 39608288 PMC: 11685032. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112501.


Implementation of an EMS-based naloxone distribution program: A qualitative evaluation.

Ager E, Purington E, Purdy M, Benenati B, Baker J, Schellack C J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024; 5(5):e13300.

PMID: 39417009 PMC: 11480357. DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13300.


Using qualitative system dynamics modeling to understand overdose bystander behavior in the context of Connecticut's Good Samaritan Laws and identify effective policy options.

Thompson R, Sabounchi N, Ali S, Heimer R, DOnofrio G, Heckmann R Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):124.

PMID: 38937759 PMC: 11210010. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00990-3.


Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing and sustaining Mobile Overdose Response Services from the perspective of Canadian key interest groups: a qualitative study.

Seo B, Rider N, Rioux W, Teare A, Jones S, Taplay P Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):28.

PMID: 38308262 PMC: 10837862. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00946-7.


Emerging Concepts in the Paramedicine Literature to Inform the Revision of a Pan-Canadian Competency Framework for Paramedics: A Restricted Review.

Bolster J, Pithia P, Batt A Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32864.

PMID: 36699791 PMC: 9870303. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32864.


References
1.
Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A . Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(1):348-355. PMC: 5407170. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw098. View

2.
Rhodes T . Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2009; 20(3):193-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003. View

3.
Lewis C, Vo H, Fishman M . Intranasal naloxone and related strategies for opioid overdose intervention by nonmedical personnel: a review. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2017; 8:79-95. PMC: 5644601. DOI: 10.2147/SAR.S101700. View

4.
Darke S, Hall W . Heroin overdose: research and evidence-based intervention. J Urban Health. 2003; 80(2):189-200. PMC: 3456279. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jtg022. View

5.
Fleming T, Damon W, Collins A, Czechaczek S, Boyd J, McNeil R . Housing in crisis: A qualitative study of the socio-legal contexts of residential evictions in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. Int J Drug Policy. 2019; 71:169-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.012. View