» Articles » PMID: 28475698

The Growing Need for Validated Biomarkers and Endpoints for Dry Eye Clinical Research

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2017 May 6
PMID 28475698
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Biomarkers with minimally invasive and reproducible objective metrics provide the key to future paradigm shifts in understanding of the underlying causes of dry eye disease (DED) and approaches to treatment of DED. We review biomarkers and their validity in providing objective metrics for DED clinical research and patient care.

Methods: The English-language literature in PubMed primarily over the last decade was surveyed for studies related to identification of biomarkers of DED: (1) inflammation, (2) point-of-care, (3) ocular imaging, and (4) genetics. Relevant studies in each group were individually evaluated for (1) methodological and analytical details, (2) data and concordance with other similar studies, and (3) potential to serve as validated biomarkers with objective metrics.

Results: Significant work has been done to identify biomarkers for DED clinical trials and for patient care. Interstudy variation among studies dealing with the same biomarker type was high. This could be attributed to biologic variations and/or differences in processing, and data analysis. Correlation with other signs and symptoms of DED was not always clear or present.

Conclusions: Many of the biomarkers reviewed show the potential to serve as validated and objective metrics for clinical research and patient care in DED. Interstudy variation for a given biomarker emphasizes the need for detailed reporting of study methodology, including information on subject characteristics, quality control, processing, and analysis methods to optimize development of nonsubjective metrics. Biomarker development offers a rich opportunity to significantly move forward clinical research and patient care in DED.

Overview: DED is an unmet medical need - a chronic pain syndrome associated with variable vision that affects quality of life, is common with advancing age, interferes with the comfortable use of contact lenses, and can diminish results of eye surgeries, such as cataract extraction, LASIK, and glaucoma procedures. It is a worldwide medical challenge with a prevalence rate ranging from 8% to 50%. Many clinicians and researchers across the globe are searching for better answers to understand the mechanisms related to the development and chronicity of DED. Though there have been many clinical trials for DED, few new treatments have emerged over the last decade. Biomarkers may provide the needed breakthrough to propel our understanding of DED to the next level and the potential to realize our goal of truly personalized medicine based on scientific evidence. Clinical trials and research on DED have suffered from the lack of validated biomarkers and less than objective and reproducible endpoints. Current work on biomarkers has provided the groundwork to move forward. This review highlights primarily ocular biomarkers that have been investigated for use in DED, discusses the methodologic outcomes in providing objective metrics for clinical research, and suggests recommendations for further work.

Citing Articles

Cornea Oculomics: A Clinical Blueprint for Extending Corneal Diagnostics and Artificial Intelligence in Systemic Health Insights.

Lee R, Kumar R, Weaver A, Kim J, Raza A, Ong J Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075889 PMC: 11899542. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050643.


Multidimensional immunotherapy for dry eye disease: current status and future directions.

Huang D, Li Z Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 4:1449283.

PMID: 39554604 PMC: 11564177. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1449283.


Longitudinal Analysis of Tear Cytokine Ratios in Association with Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study.

Zhao C, Chen Y, Yu Y, Ying G, Asbell P Curr Eye Res. 2024; 50(2):124-131.

PMID: 39267294 PMC: 11774680. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2024.2398113.


Advantages of Lissamine Green Vital Staining as an Endpoint in Dry Eye Clinical Trials.

Rodriguez J, Kerti S, Hamm A, Ousler G, Bensinger E, Burnham S Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:2193-2203.

PMID: 39131543 PMC: 11316467. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S468457.


Association of Tear Cytokine Ratios with Symptoms and Signs of Dry Eye Disease: Biomarker Data from the Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study.

Zhao C, Chen Y, Ying G, Asbell P Curr Eye Res. 2023; 49(1):16-24.

PMID: 37781912 PMC: 10841381. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2262168.


References
1.
Subramanyam M, Goyal J . Translational biomarkers: from discovery and development to clinical practice. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2016; 21-22:3-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2016.10.001. View

2.
Lanza N, McClellan A, Batawi H, Felix E, Sarantopoulos K, Levitt R . Dry Eye Profiles in Patients with a Positive Elevated Surface Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Point-of-Care Test Versus Negative Patients. Ocul Surf. 2016; 14(2):216-23. PMC: 4842325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.12.007. View

3.
Kenchegowda S, He J, Bazan H . Involvement of pigment epithelium-derived factor, docosahexaenoic acid and neuroprotectin D1 in corneal inflammation and nerve integrity after refractive surgery. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2012; 88(1):27-31. PMC: 3431458. DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2012.03.010. View

4.
Suresh L, Malyavantham K, Shen L, Ambrus Jr J . Investigation of novel autoantibodies in Sjogren's syndrome utilizing Sera from the Sjogren's international collaborative clinical alliance cohort. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15:38. PMC: 4397858. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0023-1. View

5.
Rodriguez J, Johnston P, Ousler 3rd G, Smith L, Abelson M . Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1197-1204. PMC: 3693861. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S39703. View