» Articles » PMID: 28475651

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Gentamicin in Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: Model Development and Validation of Existing Models

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 May 6
PMID 28475651
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gentamicin shows large variations in half-life and volume of distribution (Vd) within and between individuals. Thus, monitoring and accurately predicting serum levels are required to optimize effectiveness and minimize toxicity. Currently, two population pharmacokinetic models are applied for predicting gentamicin doses in adults. For endocarditis patients the optimal model is unknown. We aimed at: 1) creating an optimal model for endocarditis patients; and 2) assessing whether the endocarditis and existing models can accurately predict serum levels. We performed a retrospective observational two-cohort study: one cohort to parameterize the endocarditis model by iterative two-stage Bayesian analysis, and a second cohort to validate and compare all three models. The Akaike Information Criterion and the weighted sum of squares of the residuals divided by the degrees of freedom were used to select the endocarditis model. Median Prediction Error (MDPE) and Median Absolute Prediction Error (MDAPE) were used to test all models with the validation dataset. We built the endocarditis model based on data from the modeling cohort (65 patients) with a fixed 0.277 L/h/70kg metabolic clearance, 0.698 (±0.358) renal clearance as fraction of creatinine clearance, and Vd 0.312 (±0.076) L/kg corrected lean body mass. External validation with data from 14 validation cohort patients showed a similar predictive power of the endocarditis model (MDPE -1.77%, MDAPE 4.68%) as compared to the intensive-care (MDPE -1.33%, MDAPE 4.37%) and standard (MDPE -0.90%, MDAPE 4.82%) models. All models acceptably predicted pharmacokinetic parameters for gentamicin in endocarditis patients. However, these patients appear to have an increased Vd, similar to intensive care patients. Vd mainly determines the height of peak serum levels, which in turn correlate with bactericidal activity. In order to maintain simplicity, we advise to use the existing intensive-care model in clinical practice to avoid potential underdosing of gentamicin in endocarditis patients.

Citing Articles

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review.

Hodiamont C, van den Broek A, de Vroom S, Prins J, Mathot R, Van Hest R Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022; 61(8):1075-1094.

PMID: 35754071 PMC: 9349143. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01143-0.


Aminoglycosides in the Intensive Care Unit: What Is New in Population PK Modeling?.

Duong A, Simard C, Wang Y, Williamson D, Marsot A Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(5).

PMID: 33946905 PMC: 8145041. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050507.


Darunavir Population Pharmacokinetic Model Based on HIV Outpatient Data.

Daskapan A, Tran Q, Cattaneo D, Gervasoni C, Resnati C, Stienstra Y Ther Drug Monit. 2018; 41(1):59-65.

PMID: 30489547 PMC: 6358182. DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000576.

References
1.
Kirkpatrick C, Duffull S, Begg E . Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in 957 patients with varying renal function dosed once daily. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 47(6):637-43. PMC: 2014263. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00938.x. View

2.
Rybak M, Abate B, Kang S, Ruffing M, Lerner S, Drusano G . Prospective evaluation of the effect of an aminoglycoside dosing regimen on rates of observed nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999; 43(7):1549-55. PMC: 89322. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.7.1549. View

3.
El-Sayed Y . Correlation between nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1994; 19(4):267-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.1994.tb00686.x. View

4.
Eisen D, Corey G, McBryde E, Fowler Jr V, Miro J, Cabell C . Reduced valve replacement surgery and complication rate in Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis patients receiving acetyl-salicylic acid. J Infect. 2009; 58(5):332-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.03.006. View

5.
Li J, Sexton D, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler Jr V, Ryan T . Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 30(4):633-8. DOI: 10.1086/313753. View