» Articles » PMID: 28474123

CT Pulmonary Angiogram Quality Comparison Between Early and Later Pregnancy

Overview
Journal Emerg Radiol
Date 2017 May 6
PMID 28474123
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Pregnancy increases the risk for thromboembolic disease. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is widely used for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus (PE); however, a significant number of scans are suboptimal or non-diagnostic in pregnant patients. This phenomenon is attributed to physiology during the gravid state. The aim of this study is to examine whether all stages of pregnancy are similarly at risk for suboptimal scans.

Methods: Pregnant patients who had CTPA scans between February 2008 and November 2014 were included. The attenuation in the major pulmonary arteries was compared among patients and controls. An attenuation of 200 Hounsfield units (HU) was used as a cutoff between adequate and suboptimal studies. Statistical analysis compared attenuation means and number of arteries with adequate versus suboptimal attenuation.

Results: Forty patients were included in the study. Nine were at or below 13 weeks of pregnancy and 31 between week 14 and term. A control group of 14 non-pregnant women of similar age were also included. All arteries showed a significantly higher attenuation in early pregnancy and in the control group compared to later in pregnancy, p < 0.05. Fewer suboptimal opacified arteries were found in early pregnancy (11.1%) and controls (5.7%) compared to later in pregnancy (33.3%), p < 0.01.

Conclusion: Patients in early pregnancy are more likely to have a technically successful CTPA scan compared to later in pregnancy and show similar opacification to non-pregnant women. This suggests a possible paradigm shift from the current approach to suspected PE in pregnant patients.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of CTPA interpreted as limited in pregnant patients suspected for pulmonary embolism.

Cohen S, Wang J, Mankerian M, Feizullayeva C, McCandlish J, Barnaby D Emerg Radiol. 2019; 27(2):165-171.

PMID: 31813073 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01728-6.

References
1.
Cahill A, Stout M, Macones G, Bhalla S . Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114(1):124-129. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a99def. View

2.
U-King-Im J, Freeman S, Boylan T, Cheow H . Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(12):2709-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1100-0. View

3.
Abbas A, Lester S, Connolly H . Pregnancy and the cardiovascular system. Int J Cardiol. 2005; 98(2):179-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.028. View

4.
Mayo J, Thakur Y . Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(3):522-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9928. View

5.
Leung A, Bull T, Jaeschke R, Lockwood C, Boiselle P, Hurwitz L . American Thoracic Society documents: an official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline--Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy. Radiology. 2012; 262(2):635-46. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11114045. View