» Articles » PMID: 28452042

What Should I Expect from My Recalled Adept Hip Resurfacing?

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 29
PMID 28452042
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

"My Hip Resurfacing (HR) has been recalled. What will happen to me?" This is the question of every patient who underwent an implant recall, a highly stressful event for both patients and physicians. Triggered by a 11.64% failure rate at 7 years, a recall process started for Adept HR with head diameter less than 48 mm. We report our experience in the recall process of 40 patients with the above-mentioned components. One patient underwent revision surgery due to an adverse reaction to metal debris at 5-year follow-up. None of the patients were scheduled for revision, with an estimated survival rate of 97.6% at 7 years. Implants were well positioned with an average acetabular inclination angle of 37°. Cobalt and chromium blood levels were below the safety threshold of clinical relevance. Functional scores were excellent. In the case of a well-positioned device with normal ion levels, a good performance of the implant is generally observed. Even if we experienced a very low revision rate, this may certainly get worse over time since not all possible failures are predictable, thus requiring a careful periodic follow-up.

Citing Articles

Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach.

Regis D, Lugani G, Valentini A, Sandri A, Ambrosini C, Bagnis F Musculoskelet Surg. 2023; 107(4):439-446.

PMID: 37285004 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00789-8.


Living with a recalled implant: a qualitative study of patients' experiences with ASR hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Bitar C, Krupic F, Fellander-Tsai L, Crnalic S, Wretenberg P Patient Saf Surg. 2021; 15(1):2.

PMID: 33407687 PMC: 7788783. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-020-00278-y.

References
1.
Lewinnek G, Lewis J, Tarr R, COMPERE C, Zimmerman J . Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2):217-20. View

2.
Langton D, Joyce T, Jameson S, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland J . Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(2):164-71. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099. View

3.
Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons C . Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(7):847-51. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213. View

4.
Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent P, McMinn D . Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B(10):1298-306. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33695. View

5.
Brooks P . Hip resurfacing: a large, US single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(1 Suppl A):10-3. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36360. View