Clinical Characteristics Associated with Bradycardia and Asystole in Patients with Syncope Undergoing Long-term Electrocardiographic Monitoring with Implantable Loop Recorder

Overview

Journal Wien Klin Wochenschr

Publisher Springer

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2017 Apr 29

PMID 28451840

Citations 1

Authors

Peter Mitro

Milos Simurda

Ervin Muller

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this retrospective single center cohort study was to assess the occurrence of bradycardia during implantable loop recorder (ILR) monitoring in patients with unexplained syncope and negative conventional testing and to identify clinical predictors of bradycardia and pacemaker implantation.

Methods: An ILR was implanted in 112 patients (31 men, 81 women, mean age 64 ±13 years) with syncope which was not explained after conventional diagnostic work-up. Clinical variables were compared between patients with and without pacemaker implantation.

Results: A diagnosis was made in 67 patients (60%), including non-arrhythmic (vasodepressor) syncope (27 patients), sinus bradycardia or asystole (23 patients), atrioventricular (AV) block (14 patients) and bradycardic atrial fibrillation (3 patients). The mean time to diagnosis was 233 ± 282 days. A pacemaker was implanted in 40 patients (36%). Male gender, age above 65 years, hypertension, presence of structural heart disease, absence of prodromal symptoms, trauma secondary to syncope, asymptomatic sinus bradycardia and first-degree AV block were clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation in univariate analysis. Of the independent predictive factors three remained significant in multivariate analysis: absence of prodromal symptoms before the loss of consciousness (odds ratio OR 3.38, p = 0.01, 95% confidence interval CI 1.24-9.20), male gender (OR 3.22, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.26-8.20) and age >65 years (OR 2.94, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-8.33).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing ILR implantation bradycardia is a frequent finding despite the negative conventional diagnostic testing. Absence of prodromal symptoms, male gender and age >65 years are risk factors for bradycardia and pacemaker implantation.

Citing Articles

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zangiabadian M, Soltani K, Gholinejad Y, Yahya R, Bastami S, Akbarzadeh M Clin Cardiol. 2024; 47(2):e24221.

PMID: 38402528 PMC: 10823547. DOI: 10.1002/clc.24221.

References

Da Costa A, Defaye P, Romeyer-Bouchard C, Roche F, Dauphinot V, Deharo J . Clinical impact of the implantable loop recorder in patients with isolated syncope, bundle branch block and negative workup: a randomized multicentre prospective study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013; 106(3):146-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.12.002. View

Lacunza-Ruiz F, Moya-Mitjans A, Martinez-Alday J, Baron-Esquivias G, Ruiz-Granell R, Rivas-Gandara N . Implantable loop recorder allows an etiologic diagnosis in one-third of patients. Results of the Spanish reveal registry. Circ J. 2013; 77(10):2535-41. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-0201. View

Sreeram N, Gass M, Apitz C, Ziemer G, Hofbeck M, Emmel M . The diagnostic yield from implantable loop recorders in children and young adults. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 97(5):327-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-007-0635-4. View

Bhangu J, McMahon C, Hall P, Bennett K, Rice C, Crean P . Long-term cardiac monitoring in older adults with unexplained falls and syncope. Heart. 2016; 102(9):681-6. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308706. View

Drak-Hernandez Y, Toquero-Ramos J, Fernandez J, Perez-Pereira E, Castro-Urda V, Fernandez-Lozano I . Effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable loop recorder. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014; 66(12):943-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2013.06.009. View

Palmisano P, Accogli M, Zaccaria M, Luzzi G, Nacci F, Anaclerio M . Predictive factors for pacemaker implantation in patients receiving an implantable loop recorder for syncope remained unexplained after an extensive cardiac and neurological workup. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(4):3450-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.179. View

Kanjwal K, Kanjwal Y, Karabin B, Grubb B . Clinical symptoms associated with asystolic or bradycardic responses on implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients with recurrent syncope. Int J Med Sci. 2009; 6(2):106-10. PMC: 2669599. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6.106. View

Edvardsson N, Frykman V, van Mechelen R, Mitro P, Mohii-Oskarsson A, Pasquie J . Use of an implantable loop recorder to increase the diagnostic yield in unexplained syncope: results from the PICTURE registry. Europace. 2010; 13(2):262-9. PMC: 3024039. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq418. View

Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D, Guido V, Imperoli G, Santini M . Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24(9):811-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00827-8. View

10.

Locati E, Moya A, Oliveira M, Tanner H, Willems R, Lunati M . External prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring in unexplained syncope and palpitations: results of the SYNARR-Flash study. Europace. 2015; 18(8):1265-72. PMC: 4974630. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv311. View

11.

Avari Silva J, Bromberg B, Emge F, Bowman T, Van Hare G . Implantable Loop Recorder Monitoring for Refining Management of Children With Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(6). PMC: 4937287. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003632. View

12.

Brignole M, Donateo P, Tomaino M, Massa R, Iori M, Beiras X . Benefit of pacemaker therapy in patients with presumed neurally mediated syncope and documented asystole is greater when tilt test is negative: an analysis from the third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 7(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001103. View

13.

Ahmed N, Frontera A, Carpenter A, Cataldo S, Connolly G, Fasiolo M . Clinical Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Syncope Receiving Implantable Loop Recorder with or without ECG Conduction Abnormalities. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 38(8):934-41. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12666. View

14.

Sud S, Klein G, Skanes A, Gula L, Yee R, Krahn A . Predicting the cause of syncope from clinical history in patients undergoing prolonged monitoring. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6(2):238-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.035. View

15.

Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, Kohn M, Wells G . Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 47(5):448-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.11.019. View

16.

Del Rosso A, Ungar A, Maggi R, Giada F, Petix N, De Santo T . Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score. Heart. 2008; 94(12):1620-6. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.143123. View

17.

Lacunza-Ruiz F, Moya-Mitjans A, Martinez-Alday J, Baron-Esquivias G, Ruiz-Granell R, Rivas-Gandara N . Differences in the yield of the implantable loop recorder between secondary and tertiary centers. Cardiol J. 2014; 22(3):241-6. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0088. View

18.

Moya A, Sutton R, Ammirati F, Blanc J, Brignole M, Dahm J . Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J. 2009; 30(21):2631-71. PMC: 3295536. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp298. View

19.

Romme J, van Dijk N, Boer K, Dekker L, Stam J, Reitsma J . Influence of age and gender on the occurrence and presentation of reflex syncope. Clin Auton Res. 2008; 18(3):127-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10286-008-0465-0. View

20.

Maggi R, Roberto M, Rafanelli M, Martina R, Ceccofiglio A, Alice C . Additional diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients with initial diagnosis of real or apparent transient loss of consciousness of uncertain origin. Europace. 2014; 16(8):1226-30. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu051. View