Article: The diagnostic yield from implantable loop recorders in children and young adults

Background: Syncope and palpitations occur frequently in young patients. Noninvasive diagnostic testing may be inconclusive.

Aim: To assess the diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorders in young patients.

Patients And Methods: Thirty-three young patients underwent implantation of a loop recorder for long-term monitoring of cardiac rhythm, to establish symptom-rhythm correlation. They belonged to one of three subgroups: those with structurally normal heart, normal electrocardiogram at rest, and negative family history (n = 16); patients with structural heart disease and previous surgical repair (n = 11), and patients with proven or suspected primary electrical disease (n = 6). A combination of automatic and patient-activated recordings was used to monitor cardiac rhythm during symptomatic episodes.

Results: There were no procedural complications. Diagnostic electrograms could be obtained in all patients. A high degree of symptom-rhythm correlation was established. In 8/33 patients, no recurrence of symptoms was observed either until end of battery life of the device (n = 4) or until last follow-up (n = 2). Specific cardiac therapy was required, based on rhythms recorded by the device in 15 patients (until last follow-up). This consisted of catheter ablation of a tachyarrhythmia (n = 7), pacemaker implantation or upgrade (n = 5) or ICD implantation (n = 5). In the remaining patients (n = 10), recurrence of symptoms was associated with a normal electrocardiogram, and in two of these patients a non-cardiac diagnosis was made.

Conclusions: In selected patients, the implantable loop recorder provides valuable diagnostic information to guide further therapy.

Citing Articles

A Single-center Experience Comparing First- Versus Second-generation Insertable Cardiac Monitors in Pediatric Patients.

Miller N, Roelle L, Lorimer Jr D, Dalal A, Orr W, Van Hare G J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022; 13(6):5048-5056.

PMID: 35765585 PMC: 9221184. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130605.

Ambulatory Arrhythmia Detection with ZIO® XT Patch in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Devices.

Pradhan S, Robinson J, Shivapour J, Snyder C Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 40(5):921-924.

PMID: 30937502 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-019-02089-0.

Clinical characteristics associated with bradycardia and asystole in patients with syncope undergoing long-term electrocardiographic monitoring with implantable loop recorder.

Mitro P, Simurda M, Muller E Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017; 129(13-14):451-457.

PMID: 28451840 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-017-1197-8.

PocketECG: A New Noninvasive Method for Continuous and Real-Time ECG Monitoring-Initial Results in Children and Adolescents.

Bieganowska K, Kaszuba A, Bieganowski M, Kaczmarek K Pediatr Cardiol. 2017; 38(3):448-455.

PMID: 28101660 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1534-0.

Comparison of contact force-guided procedure with non-contact force-guided procedure during left atrial mapping and pulmonary vein isolation: impact of contact force on recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

Makimoto H, Heeger C, Lin T, Rillig A, Metzner A, Wissner E Clin Res Cardiol. 2015; 104(10):861-70.

PMID: 25893569 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-015-0855-y.

References

1.

Alexander M, Walsh E, Saul J, Epstein M, Triedman J . Value of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999; 10(8):1033-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00274.x. View

2.

Sreeram N, Hitchcock F, Bennink G . Abdominal implantation of loop recorders in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79(2):726-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.019. View

3.

Gass M, Apitz C, Salehi-Gilani S, Ziemer G, Hofbeck M . Use of the implantable loop recorder in children and adolescents. Cardiol Young. 2006; 16(6):572-8. DOI: 10.1017/S1047951106001156. View

4.

Rossano J, Bloemers B, Sreeram N, Balaji S, Shah M . Efficacy of implantable loop recorders in establishing symptom-rhythm correlation in young patients with syncope and palpitations. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(3 Pt 1):e228-33. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.3.e228. View

5.

Kammeraad J, van Deurzen C, Sreeram N, Bink-Boelkens M, Ottenkamp J, Helbing W . Predictors of sudden cardiac death after Mustard or Senning repair for transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(5):1095-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.073. View

6.

Khairy P, Landzberg M, Gatzoulis M, Lucron H, Lambert J, Marcon F . Value of programmed ventricular stimulation after tetralogy of fallot repair: a multicenter study. Circulation. 2004; 109(16):1994-2000. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126495.11040.BD. View

7.

Krahn A, Klein G, Yee R, Norris C . Final results from a pilot study with an implantable loop recorder to determine the etiology of syncope in patients with negative noninvasive and invasive testing. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82(1):117-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00237-9. View

8.

Hoorntje T, Langerak W, Sreeram N . Munchausen's syndrome by proxy identified with an implantable electrocardiographic recorder. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341(19):1478-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199911043411919. View

9.

Krahn A, Klein G, Yee R, Norris C . Use of an extended monitoring strategy in patients with problematic syncope. Reveal Investigators. Circulation. 1999; 99(3):406-10. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.3.406. View

10.

Sanatani S, Peirone A, Chiu C, Human D, Gross G, Hamilton R . Use of an implantable loop recorder in the evaluation of children with congenital heart disease. Am Heart J. 2002; 143(2):366-72. DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.120157. View

11.

Ashby D, Cehic D, Disney P, Mahar L, Young G . A retrospective case study to assess the value of the implantable loop recorder for the investigation of undiagnosed syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002; 25(8):1200-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01200.x. View

The Diagnostic Yield from Implantable Loop Recorders in Children and Young Adults