» Articles » PMID: 28449008

Extended RAS Analysis and Correlation with Overall Survival in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract

Background: Mutations in the KRAS gene can be detected in about 70-90% of pancreatic cancer (PC) cases. Whether these mutations have a prognostic or predictive value remains elusive. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of the extended RAS (KRAS+NRAS) mutational status is unclear in PC.

Methods: We prospectively defined a PC patient population who received erlotinib-free chemotherapy regimens. A statistically significant difference between KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutated tumours in at least 160 patients in this population would support the assumption of a rather prognostic role of KRAS.

Results: One hundred and seventy-eight tumour samples were collected from prospective clinical studies and successfully analysed for the extended RAS status: 37 tumours were KRAS wild-type (21%), whereas 141 (79%) carried a KRAS mutation; 132 of these mutations were found in KRAS exon 2 (74%), whereas only 9 mutations (5%) were detected in KRAS exon 3. Within KRAS exon 4 and NRAS exons 2-4, no mutations were apparent. There was no significant difference in overall survival for KRAS wild-type vs mutant patients (9.9 vs 8.3 months, P=0.70).

Conclusions: Together with the results of the AIO-PK-0104-trial, the present analysis supports the notion that KRAS mutation status is rather predictive than prognostic in advanced PC.

Citing Articles

Mutant KRAS and GATA6 Stratify Survival in Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Chun J, Lee D, Han N, Heo S, Kim H, Lee M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075743 PMC: 11899085. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050896.


RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms.

Yang X, Wu H J Hematol Oncol. 2024; 17(1):108.

PMID: 39522047 PMC: 11550559. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-024-01631-9.


Prognostic Role of Specific Mutations Detected in Aspiration and Liquid Biopsies from Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Halkova T, Bunganic B, Traboulsi E, Minarik M, Zavoral M, Benesova L Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39457426 PMC: 11507146. DOI: 10.3390/genes15101302.


Unveiling the role of in Chinese colorectal cancer patients: a positive influence on tumor mutational burden.

Wan X, Zhang X, Xu M, Zheng Z, Zhou Y, Zhong Z Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(9):4752-4762.

PMID: 39430843 PMC: 11483435. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-600.


TPX2 expression as a negative predictor of gemcitabine efficacy in pancreatic cancer.

Guenther M, Surendran S, Haas M, Heinemann V, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Engel J Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(1):175-182.

PMID: 37142730 PMC: 10307892. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02295-x.


References
1.
Kruger S, Haas M, Ormanns S, Bachmann S, Siveke J, Kirchner T . Translational research in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current evidence and future concepts. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(31):10769-77. PMC: 4138457. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10769. View

2.
Shin S, Kim S, Hong S, Kim Y, Song K, Park K . Genetic alterations of K-ras, p53, c-erbB-2, and DPC4 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their correlation with patient survival. Pancreas. 2013; 42(2):216-22. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31825b6ab0. View

3.
Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, Yan L, Cantor M, Namgyal C . Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by Pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2005; 7(3):413-21. PMC: 1867544. DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60571-5. View

4.
Schlitter A, Jang K, Kloppel G, Saka B, Hong S, Choi H . Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 cases. Mod Pathol. 2015; 28(9):1249-64. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.61. View

5.
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y . FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(19):1817-25. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923. View