» Articles » PMID: 28442296

An Information Theory Framework for Dynamic Functional Domain Connectivity

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Apr 27
PMID 28442296
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) analyzes time evolution of coherent activity in the brain. In this technique dynamic changes are considered for the whole brain. This paper proposes an information theory framework to measure information flowing among subsets of functional networks call functional domains.

New Method: Our method aims at estimating bits of information contained and shared among domains. The succession of dynamic functional states is estimated at the domain level. Information quantity is based on the probabilities of observing each dynamic state. Mutual information measurement is then obtained from probabilities across domains. Thus, we named this value the cross domain mutual information (CDMI).

Results: Strong CDMIs were observed in relation to the subcortical domain. Domains related to sensorial input, motor control and cerebellum form another CDMI cluster. Information flow among other domains was seldom found.

Comparison With Existing Methods: Other methods of dynamic connectivity focus on whole brain dFNC matrices. In the current framework, information theory is applied to states estimated from pairs of multi-network functional domains. In this context, we apply information theory to measure information flow across functional domains.

Conclusion: Identified CDMI clusters point to known information pathways in the basal ganglia and also among areas of sensorial input, patterns found in static functional connectivity. In contrast, CDMI across brain areas of higher level cognitive processing follow a different pattern that indicates scarce information sharing. These findings show that employing information theory to formally measured information flow through brain domains reveals additional features of functional connectivity.

Citing Articles

Planning ahead: Predictable switching recruits task-active and resting-state networks.

Kurtin D, Arana-Oiarbide G, Lorenz R, Violante I, Hampshire A Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 44(15):5030-5046.

PMID: 37471699 PMC: 10502652. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26430.


Decreased Cross-Domain Mutual Information in Schizophrenia From Dynamic Connectivity States.

Salman M, Vergara V, Damaraju E, Calhoun V Front Neurosci. 2019; 13:873.

PMID: 31507357 PMC: 6714616. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00873.


Altered Domain Functional Network Connectivity Strength and Randomness in Schizophrenia.

Vergara V, Damaraju E, Turner J, Pearlson G, Belger A, Mathalon D Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10:499.

PMID: 31396111 PMC: 6664085. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00499.


An information network flow approach for measuring functional connectivity and predicting behavior.

Kumar S, Yoo K, Rosenberg M, Scheinost D, Constable R, Zhang S Brain Behav. 2019; 9(8):e01346.

PMID: 31286688 PMC: 6710195. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1346.


Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Schizophrenia with Magnetoencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Do Different Timescales Tell a Different Story?.

Sanfratello L, Houck J, Calhoun V Brain Connect. 2019; 9(3):251-262.

PMID: 30632385 PMC: 6479258. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2018.0608.


References
1.
Tononi G, Edelman G, Sporns O . Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 2(12):474-84. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01259-5. View

2.
Chen J, Glover G, Greicius M, Chang C . Dissociated patterns of anti-correlations with dorsal and ventral default-mode networks at rest. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017; 38(5):2454-2465. PMC: 5385153. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23532. View

3.
Vergara V, Mayer A, Damaraju E, Hutchison K, Calhoun V . The effect of preprocessing pipelines in subject classification and detection of abnormal resting state functional network connectivity using group ICA. Neuroimage. 2016; 145(Pt B):365-376. PMC: 5035165. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.038. View

4.
Raz A . Anatomy of attentional networks. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2004; 281(1):21-36. DOI: 10.1002/ar.b.20035. View

5.
Rosazza C, Minati L . Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications. Neurol Sci. 2011; 32(5):773-85. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-011-0636-y. View