» Articles » PMID: 28433467

Modeling Hypohedonia Following Repeated Social Defeat: Individual Vulnerability and Dopaminergic Involvement

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2017 Apr 24
PMID 28433467
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social defeat in rodents putatively can model hypohedonia. The present studies examined models for assessing hypohedonia-like behavior and tested the hypotheses that 1) individual differences in baseline reward sensitivity predict vulnerability, and 2) defeat elicits changes in pharmacological measures of striatal dopaminergic function. Male Wistar rats (n=142) received repeated defeat (3 "triad" blocks of 3 defeats) or control handling. To determine whether defeat influenced consumption of SuperSac (glucose-saccharin) over an isocaloric, less preferred, glucose solution, a 2-choice paradigm was used. To determine repeated defeat effects on the reinforcing efficacy of SuperSac, a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement was used. Amphetamine-induced locomotor activity (0.08mg/kg, s.c.) was determined as a measure sensitive to striatal dopaminergic function. Defeat reduced SuperSac consumption during the first two triads-an effect seen in the third triad only in defeated rats with High vs. Low baseline SuperSac intake. The characteristic escalation in PR breakpoint for SuperSac normally seen in controls was absent in defeated rats, leading to a significant difference by the third triad. Defeat-induced blunting of the escalation in PR performance was greater in rats with High antecedent PR breakpoints and persisted 2.5weeks post-defeat. Repeated defeat also blunted amphetamine-induced locomotion 13days post-defeat. Thus, hypohedonic-like effects of social defeat were detected and accompanied by persistently attenuated striatal dopamine function. Early effects were seen for consumption of differentially-palatable solutions, and persistent effects were seen for the "breakpoint" motivational measure. The results implicate initial reward sensitivity as a risk factor for stress-induced hypohedonia.

Citing Articles

Intermittent social stress produces different short- and long-term effects on effort-based reward-seeking behavior.

Lemon C, Del Arco A Behav Brain Res. 2021; 417:113613.

PMID: 34600962 PMC: 8670294. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113613.


Converging vulnerability factors for compulsive food and drug use.

Serafine K, ODell L, Zorrilla E Neuropharmacology. 2021; 196:108556.

PMID: 33862029 PMC: 8445770. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108556.


Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptors in the Locus Coeruleus Modulate the Enhancement of Active Coping Behaviors Induced by Chronic Predator Odor Inoculation in Mice.

Wang Q, Liu Y, Zhang J, Wang W Front Psychol. 2020; 10:3028.

PMID: 31998206 PMC: 6965494. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03028.


Motivational Impairment is Accompanied by Corticoaccumbal Dysfunction in the BACHD-Tg5 Rat Model of Huntington's Disease.

Zlebnik N, Gildish I, Sesia T, Fitoussi A, Cole E, Carson B Cereb Cortex. 2019; 29(11):4763-4774.

PMID: 30753343 PMC: 7150618. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz009.


Making Sense of Rodent Models of Anhedonia.

Scheggi S, De Montis M, Gambarana C Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018; 21(11):1049-1065.

PMID: 30239762 PMC: 6209858. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy083.


References
1.
Rygula R, Abumaria N, Flugge G, Fuchs E, Ruther E, Havemann-Reinecke U . Anhedonia and motivational deficits in rats: impact of chronic social stress. Behav Brain Res. 2005; 162(1):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.03.009. View

2.
Bergamini G, Cathomas F, Auer S, Sigrist H, Seifritz E, Patterson M . Mouse psychosocial stress reduces motivation and cognitive function in operant reward tests: A model for reward pathology with effects of agomelatine. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016; 26(9):1448-1464. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.06.009. View

3.
Halladay L, Blair H . Distinct ensembles of medial prefrontal cortex neurons are activated by threatening stimuli that elicit excitation vs. inhibition of movement. J Neurophysiol. 2015; 114(2):793-807. PMC: 4533059. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00656.2014. View

4.
Valenstein E, Cox V, Kakolewski J . Polydipsia elicited by the synergistic action of a saccharin and glucose solution. Science. 1967; 157(3788):552-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.157.3788.552. View

5.
Volpicelli J, Ulm R, Hopson N . The bidirectional effects of shock on alcohol preference in rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1990; 14(6):913-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1990.tb01837.x. View