» Articles » PMID: 28432561

Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Whom? A Simulated Example of Patient Spectrum Influencing the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Apr 23
PMID 28432561
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The influence of patient spectrum on the sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic methods has been termed spectrum bias or spectrum effect. Receiver operating characteristics curves are often used to assess the ability of diagnostic methods to predict fluid responsiveness. As a receiver operating characteristics curve is a presentation of sensitivity and specificity, the purpose of the present manuscript was to explore if patient spectrum could affect areas under receiver operating characteristics curves and their gray zones. Relationships between stroke volume variation and change in stroke volume in two different patient populations using simulated data. Simulated patient populations with stroke volume variation values between 5 and 15 or 3 and 25% had median (2.5th-97.5th percentiles) areas under receiver operating characteristics curves of 0.79 (0.65-0.90) and 0.93 (0.85-0.99), respectively. The gray zones indicating range of diagnostic uncertainty were also affected. The patient spectrum can affect common statistics from receiver operating characteristics curves, indicating the need for considering patient spectrum when evaluating the abilities of different methods to predict fluid responsiveness.

Citing Articles

Volumetric and End-Tidal Capnography for the Detection of Cardiac Output Changes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Early after Open Heart Surgery.

Hoff I, Oivind Hoiseth L, Kirkeboen K, Landsverk S Crit Care Res Pract. 2019; 2019:6393649.

PMID: 31281675 PMC: 6589280. DOI: 10.1155/2019/6393649.


Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Saugel B, Flick M, Bendjelid K, Critchley L, Vistisen S, Scheeren T J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; 33(2):211-222.

PMID: 30847738 PMC: 6420447. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00297-w.

References
1.
Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer C, Goarin J, Lehot J, Vallet B . Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115(2):231-41. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a. View

2.
Usher-Smith J, Sharp S, Griffin S . The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis. BMJ. 2016; 353:i3139. PMC: 4916916. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3139. View

3.
Cannesson M . The "grey zone" or how to avoid the binary constraint of decision-making. Can J Anaesth. 2015; 62(11):1139-42. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0465-1. View

4.
Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, Houle T . Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology. 2010; 112(4):1023-40. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d47604. View

5.
Bland J, Altman D . Correlation in restricted ranges of data. BMJ. 2011; 342:d556. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d556. View