» Articles » PMID: 28431947

A Bout Analysis of Operant Response Disruption

Overview
Journal Behav Processes
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2017 Apr 23
PMID 28431947
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Operant behavior appears to be organized in bouts of responses, whose parameters are differentially sensitive to various manipulations. This study investigated potential differential effects of three forms of operant response disruption-extinction (EXT), non-contingent reinforcement (NCR), and prefeeding (PRE)-on response bouts. In Experiment 1, Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) were trained on a tandem variable-time (VT) 120s fixed-ratio (FR) 5 schedule of reinforcement; after stability was established, their responding was disrupted for three sessions with one of the three disrupters (EXT, NCR, or PRE). In Experiment 2, Long Evans (LE) rats were trained on a tandem VT 240s FR 5 to stability, and their responding disrupted with EXT or NCR. In EXT and NCR, response rates declined significantly and progressively over the course of the session, primarily due to a declining bout-initiation rate in EXT, and to fewer responses per bout in NCR. In contrast, a session-wide drop in response rate was observed in PRE, primarily due to a reduction in bout-initiation rate at the start of the session. These findings suggest that each form of disruption differentially impacts dissociable aspects of behavior. Theories of behavioral persistence should account for these functional relations, which appear to be obscured in response rate measures.

Citing Articles

Bouts, Pauses, and Units of Operant Performance: A Primer.

Falligant J, P Hagopian L, Newland M Perspect Behav Sci. 2024; 47(3):643-674.

PMID: 39309239 PMC: 11411050. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-024-00419-z.


The temporal structure of goal-directed and habitual operant behavior.

Thrailkill E, Daniels C J Exp Anal Behav. 2023; 121(1):38-51.

PMID: 38131488 PMC: 10872308. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.896.


Motivated to time: Effects of reinforcer devaluation and opportunity cost on interval timing.

Gupta T, Sanabria F Learn Behav. 2023; 51(3):308-320.

PMID: 36781823 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-023-00572-6.


Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.

Brackney R, Garcia R, Sanabria F Learn Behav. 2021; 49(3):330-342.

PMID: 33629243 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-021-00464-7.


Internal-Clock Models and Misguided Views of Mechanistic Explanations: A Reply to Eckard & Lattal (2020).

Sanabria F Perspect Behav Sci. 2020; 43(4):779-790.

PMID: 33381688 PMC: 7724008. DOI: 10.1007/s40614-020-00268-6.


References
1.
Shull R, Gaynor S, Grimes J . Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 2002; 77(3):211-31. PMC: 1284858. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-211. View

2.
Podlesnik C, Sanabria F . Repeated extinction and reversal learning of an approach response supports an arousal-mediated learning model. Behav Processes. 2010; 87(1):125-34. PMC: 4762371. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.005. View

3.
Brackney R, Sanabria F . The distribution of response bout lengths and its sensitivity to differential reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 2015; 104(2):167-85. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.168. View

4.
Higa J . Dynamics of time discrimination: II. The effects of multiple impulses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996; 66(1):117-34. PMC: 1284554. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-117. View

5.
Reed P . The structure of random ratio responding in humans. J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015; 41(4):419-31. DOI: 10.1037/xan0000081. View