A Comparison of Molecular Typing Methods Applied to Complex: Sequencing, Rep-PCR, and MLST
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Molecular typing using repetitive sequenced-based PCR (rep-PCR) and sequencing were applied to a collection of diverse complex isolates. To determine the most practical method for reference laboratories, we analyzed 71 complex isolates from sporadic and outbreak occurrences originating from 4 geographic areas. While rep-PCR was more discriminating, sequencing provided a broader and a more objective geographical tracking method similar to multilocus sequence typing (MLST). In addition, we suggest that MLST may have higher discriminative power compared to sequencing, although rep-PCR remains the most discriminative method for local outbreak investigations. In addition, rep-PCR can be an effective and inexpensive method for local outbreak investigation.
Jian X, Li Y, Wang H, Li C, Li F, Li J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1298202.
PMID: 38524181 PMC: 10960357. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1298202.
Genetic Characterization of the O-Antigen and Development of a Molecular Serotyping Scheme for .
Li Y, Huang J, Wang X, Xu C, Han T, Guo X Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:727.
PMID: 32411106 PMC: 7198725. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00727.
Khachatryan L, Kraakman M, Bernards A, Laros J BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):338.
PMID: 31060512 PMC: 6501397. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5723-0.
Advanced DNA fingerprint genotyping based on a model developed from real chip electrophoresis data.
Skutkova H, Vitek M, Bezdicek M, Brhelova E, Lengerova M J Adv Res. 2019; 18:9-18.
PMID: 30788173 PMC: 6369143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.01.005.
Microbiome at the Frontier of Personalized Medicine.
Kashyap P, Chia N, Nelson H, Segal E, Elinav E Mayo Clin Proc. 2017; 92(12):1855-1864.
PMID: 29202942 PMC: 5730337. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.10.004.