Interrater and Test-retest Reliability and Validity of the Norwegian Version of the BESTest and Mini-BESTest in People with Increased Risk of Falling

Overview

Journal BMC Geriatr

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2017 Apr 22

PMID 28427332

Citations 13

Authors

Charlotta Hamre

Pernille Botolfsen

Gro Gujord Tangen

Jorunn L Helbostad

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) was developed to assess underlying systems for balance control in order to be able to individually tailor rehabilitation interventions to people with balance disorders. A short form, the Mini-BESTest, was developed as a screening test. The study aimed to assess interrater and test-retest reliability of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest in community-dwelling people with increased risk of falling and to assess concurrent validity with the Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and it was an observational study with a cross-sectional design.

Methods: Forty-two persons with increased risk of falling (elderly over 65 years of age, persons with a history of stroke or Multiple Sclerosis) were assessed twice by two raters. Relative reliability was analysed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Concurrent validity was assessed against the FES-I using Spearman's rho.

Results: The BESTest showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.98, SEM = 1.79, SDC = 5.0) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.89/0.89, SEM = 3.9/4.3, SDC = 10.8/11.8). The Mini-BESTest also showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.95, SEM = 1.19, SDC = 3.3) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.85/0.84, SEM = 1.8/1.9, SDC = 4.9/5.2). The correlations were moderate between the FES-I and both the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest (Spearman's rho -0.51 and-0.50, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The BESTest and its short form, the Mini-BESTest, showed very good interrater and test-retest reliability when assessed in a heterogeneous sample of people with increased risk of falling. The concurrent validity measured against the FES-I showed moderate correlation. The results are comparable with earlier studies and indicate that the Norwegian versions can be used in daily clinic and in research.

Citing Articles

Assessing Falls Efficacy in Seniors: Important Insights in Hospital and Community Settings.

Soh S, Ting H, Ho J, Tan S, Kayambu G, Koh K J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2025; 10(1):48-53.

PMID: 40035087 PMC: 11872249. DOI: 10.22540/JFSF-10-048.

Measurement Properties of the BESTest Scale in People With Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Arcolin I, Giardini M, Tagliabue F, Belluscio V, Horak F, Godi M Phys Ther. 2024; 105(3).

PMID: 39665367 PMC: 11890282. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae178.

Utilization of Motor Imagery Training for Improvement of Balance of Ataxic Children after Medulloblastoma Resection.

Alsakhawi R, Elshafey M, Alkhouli M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29500.

PMID: 39604382 PMC: 11603029. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78900-7.

Design and Psychometric Evaluation of Nurses' Mobile Health Device Acceptance Scale (NMHDA-Scale): Application of the Expectation-Confirmation Theory.

Mirabootalebi N, Meidani Z, Akbari H, Rangraz Jeddi F, Tagharrobi Z, Swoboda W JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e55324.

PMID: 39288375 PMC: 11445626. DOI: 10.2196/55324.

Feasibility of a new intervention addressing group-based balance and high-intensity training, physical activity, and employment in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Arntzen E, Braaten T, Fikke H, Normann B Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 4:1258737.

PMID: 38259873 PMC: 10801079. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1258737.

References

Maia A, Rodrigues-De-Paula F, Magalhaes L, Teixeira R . Cross-cultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and MiniBESTest in the elderly and individuals with Parkinson's disease: application of the Rasch model. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013; 17(3):195-217. DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000085. View

Bortz 2nd W . A conceptual framework of frailty: a review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002; 57(5):M283-8. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/57.5.m283. View

Matsuda P, Shumway-Cook A, Bamer A, Johnson S, Amtmann D, Kraft G . Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM R. 2011; 3(7):624-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.015. View

Helbostad J, Taraldsen K, Granbo R, Yardley L, Todd C, Sletvold O . Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International in fall-prone older persons. Age Ageing. 2009; 39(2):259. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp224. View

Kerse N, Parag V, Feigin V, McNaughton H, Hackett M, Bennett D . Falls after stroke: results from the Auckland Regional Community Stroke (ARCOS) Study, 2002 to 2003. Stroke. 2008; 39(6):1890-3. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509885. View

OLoughlin J, Robitaille Y, Boivin J, Suissa S . Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 137(3):342-54. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116681. View

Powell L, Myers A . The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995; 50A(1):M28-34. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28. View

Mancini M, Horak F . The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46(2):239-48. PMC: 3033730. View

Moe-Nilssen R, Nordin E, Lundin-Olsson L . Criteria for evaluation of measurement properties of clinical balance measures for use in fall prevention studies. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14(2):236-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00839.x. View

10.

Finlayson M, Peterson E, Cho C . Risk factors for falling among people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87(9):1274-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.002. View

11.

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

12.

Bland J, Altman D . Measurement error. BMJ. 1996; 313(7059):744. PMC: 2352101. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.744. View

13.

Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A . Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998; 17(1):101-10. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::aid-sim727>3.0.co;2-e. View

14.

Sibley K, Howe T, Lamb S, Lord S, Maki B, Rose D . Recommendations for a core outcome set for measuring standing balance in adult populations: a consensus-based approach. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0120568. PMC: 4358983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120568. View

15.

Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C . Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing. 2005; 34(6):614-9. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afi196. View

16.

Rodrigues L, Marques A, Barros P, Michaelsen S . Reliability of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and BESTest sections for adults with hemiparesis. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014; 18(3):276-81. PMC: 4183491. DOI: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0033. View

17.

Leddy A, Crowner B, Earhart G . Functional gait assessment and balance evaluation system test: reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying individuals with Parkinson disease who fall. Phys Ther. 2010; 91(1):102-13. PMC: 3017321. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100113. View

18.

Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View

19.

Shrout P, Fleiss J . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86(2):420-8. DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. View

20.

Huang M, Miller K, Smith K, Fredrickson K, Shilling T . Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Its Short Versions in Older Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015; 39(2):58-63. DOI: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000047. View