» Articles » PMID: 28426922

Feasibility and Acceptability of "healthy Directions" a Lifestyle Intervention for Adults with Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal Psychooncology
Publisher Wiley
Specialties Oncology
Psychology
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28426922
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aims of this feasibility study of an adapted lifestyle intervention for adults with lung cancer were to (1) determine rates of enrollment, attrition, and completion of 5 nurse-patient contacts; (2) examine demographic characteristics of those more likely to enroll into the program; (3) determine acceptability of the intervention; and (4) identify patient preferences for the format of supplemental educational intervention materials.

Methods: This study used a single-arm, pretest and posttest design. Feasibility was defined as ≥20% enrollment and a completion rate of 70% for 5 nurse-patient contact sessions. Acceptability was defined as 80% of patients recommending the program to others. Data was collected through electronic data bases and phone interviews. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for analyses.

Results: Of 147 eligible patients, 42 (28.6%) enrolled and of these, 32 (76.2%) started the intervention and 27 (N = 27/32; 84.4%; 95% CI, 67.2%-94.7%) completed the intervention. Patients who were younger were more likely to enroll in the study (P = .04) whereas there were no significant differences by gender (P = .35). Twenty-three of the 24 (95.8%) participants' contacted posttest recommended the intervention for others. Nearly equal numbers of participants chose the website (n = 16, 50%) vs print (n = 14, 44%).

Conclusion: The intervention was feasible and acceptable in patients with lung cancer. Recruitment rates were higher and completion rates were similar as compared to previous home-based lifestyle interventions for patients with other types of cancer. Strategies to enhance recruitment of older adults are important for future research.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of a digital lifestyle intervention on health-related QUAlity of life in non-small cell LUng CAncer survivors following inpatient rehabilitation: protocol of the QUALUCA Swiss multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Weber M, Raab A, Schmitt K, Busching G, Marcin T, Spielmanns M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e081397.

PMID: 38453202 PMC: 10921523. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081397.


Investigating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of a Brief Dementia Awareness for Caregivers (DAC) Course: A Mixed Methods Study.

Patel R, Evans I, Stoner C, Spector A Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18:1923-1935.

PMID: 38020448 PMC: 10676089. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S429556.


Improving Clinical and Family Communication for Adult Child Caregivers of a Parent With a Blood Cancer: Single-Arm Pre-Post Pilot Intervention.

Bylund C, Wollney E, Campbell-Salome G, Applebaum A, Paige S, DeGruccio K JMIR Cancer. 2022; 8(3):e38722.

PMID: 35788019 PMC: 9297135. DOI: 10.2196/38722.


Gamification for Family Engagement in Lifestyle Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Blok A, Valley T, Abbott P Prev Sci. 2021; 22(7):831-844.

PMID: 33786746 PMC: 8460596. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01214-x.


Nurse-Driven mHealth Implementation Using the Technology Inpatient Program for Smokers (TIPS): Mixed Methods Study.

Blok A, Sadasivam R, Hogan T, Patterson A, Day N, Houston T JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(10):e14331.

PMID: 31588908 PMC: 6818438. DOI: 10.2196/14331.


References
1.
Gelberg L, Andersen R, Leake B . The Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34(6):1273-302. PMC: 1089079. View

2.
McBride C, Emmons K, Lipkus I . Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18(2):156-70. DOI: 10.1093/her/18.2.156. View

3.
Emmons K, Stoddard A, Gutheil C, Suarez E, Lobb R, Fletcher R . Cancer prevention for working class, multi-ethnic populations through health centers: the healthy directions study. Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14(8):727-37. DOI: 10.1023/a:1026375408862. View

4.
Cooley M, Sarna L, Brown J, Williams R, Chernecky C, Padilla G . Challenges of recruitment and retention in multisite clinical research. Cancer Nurs. 2004; 26(5):376-84. DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200310000-00006. View

5.
Emmons K, Stoddard A, Fletcher R, Gutheil C, Suarez E, Lobb R . Cancer prevention among working class, multiethnic adults: results of the healthy directions-health centers study. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(7):1200-5. PMC: 1449340. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.038695. View